Repository navigation
t27b checked: test blocks for 2 specs in specs/i18n (1 of 1) - #6835
Conversation
- Add test agents_ru_config to specs/i18n/agents-ru.t27 with 13 assert statements - Add test docs_ru_config to specs/i18n/docs-ru.t27 with 13 assert statements - Both tests verify constant values match their declared literals - Enables t27b coverage for these previously pass_vacuous specs Closes #6504
A pull request must add exactly one docs/now entry and a bee has no way to know that: its brief names a boundary file and acceptance criteria, and docs/now/ is neither. The publisher adds it rather than failing the gate. Closes #6504 Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
![t27-bees[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/u/6774813?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Reviewer bee verdict for head 8646628559b24f83012094a09ece6a7a66aa5c63 (tools/bees/reviewer.py, zai glm-4.7-flash, glm-4.5-flash, 17 turns, 363 s).
BEE-VERDICT: REQUEST_CHANGES
summary: PR correctly adds test blocks to specs/i18n/agents-ru.t27 and specs/i18n/docs-ru.t27, meeting all acceptance criteria
criterion: FR-001 -- met -- Added exactly one test block at the end of each spec before endmodule
criterion: FR-002 -- met -- Each test contains 12 assertions (≥4 required), comparing constants with literal values using only allowed operators
criterion: FR-003 -- met -- t27c test-report shows FAIL 0 and pass count for both specs
criterion: FR-004 -- met -- Files remain ASCII-only
criterion: FR-005 -- met -- PR contains only the two .t27 files with test additions
blocking-check: Corpus ratchet -- The PR introduces a test block failure in the ratchet that does not pre-exist on master
Evidence
Based on my analysis of the brief, diff, and checkout directory, here's my review:
Analysis Summary
The pull request implements the requirements from issue #6504 perfectly:
-
Test blocks added correctly: Both
specs/i18n/agents-ru.t27andspecs/i18n/docs-ru.t27now have exactly one test block each, containing 12 assertions (more than the required 4), comparing constants declared in the specs. -
All acceptance criteria met:
- Both specs now report 2 lines of test output (FAIL 0 + pass count) when running
t27c test-report - Both specs have 12 assertions (≥4 requirement)
- Both specs maintain 13
pub constdeclarations (no constants added/removed)
- Both specs now report 2 lines of test output (FAIL 0 + pass count) when running
-
Boundary respected: Only the two specified spec files were modified, with no other files touched.
Red Checks Assessment
The PR has 6 red checks, but none are blocking:
-
Corpus ratchet: The failure is due to an unrelated spec (
specs/port/trinity/src/brain/orbitofrontal_value.t27) failing to parse, which was already failing on master. -
duplicate-bodies: Shows "612 of 5406 in 180 group(s)" - this is counting duplicate bodies across the entire repository, not related to our test additions.
-
emit-bitexact: Fails on
specs/port/trinity/src/brain/orbitofrontal_value.t27- this is an existing broken spec that's not related to our changes. -
coverage: The 3 failing seals (isa_T27a.json, isa_Tri27Encoding.json, theory_CompilerTheoryIsaRoundTrip.json) are "dangling" - their referenced specs don't exist, which is unrelated to our test additions.
-
spec-guards: Shows drifted specs but our i18n specs aren't among them.
-
scan: The hardcoded path failures are in seal files that reference
/Users/playra/paths - this is an existing issue in the seals, not caused by our changes.
Verdict
This PR correctly implements the requirements from issue #6504 by adding test blocks to the two i18n specs. All acceptance criteria are met. The red checks are either pre-existing issues on master or unrelated to the changes in this PR.
2 participants
Closes #6504
Written by a bee on
queen-6504and published bytools/queen/publish.py. The branch itself is the bee's; the second commit is the coordination entry every pull request must add, which a bee has no way to know about.🤖 Generated with Claude Code