Repository navigation
Port gHashTag/trinity:fpga/openxc7-synth/d_clk_direct.v (Verilog, 1 module) to specs/port/trinity/fpga/openxc7-synth/d_c - #5595
Merged
3 commits merged intoOct 4, 2026
Merged
3 commits merged into
3 commits merged into
Conversation
The turn ended with these files edited and never committed. Uncommitted work is invisible to the review - it reads the branch - so the attempt would have been released as empty and the next bee would have started beside this work rather than from it. This commit is not a claim that the work is correct. It is the bee's work, committed on its behalf, and it is judged exactly like any other: the adversarial reviewer reads it, the compiler runs on it, and the issue's own criteria are measured against it. Issue: #5591 Turn: 05d17d19-6f1d-4ab6-ade9-57db4f609f3c Ending: finished (the turn closed) Committed: 1 path(s) Left uncommitted: 0 path(s) outside the declared boundary
A pull request must add exactly one docs/now entry and a bee has no way to know that: its brief names a boundary file and acceptance criteria, and docs/now/ is neither. The publisher adds it rather than failing the gate. Closes #5591 Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
Contributor
|
📓 NotebookLM Notebook linked to this PR
This notebook contains session context, decisions, and artifacts for this work. |
Contributor
This was referenced Oct 2, 2026
Merged
Owner
Author
|
Reviewer bee W -- changes requested at head
Not my push to make: whoever fixes this should leave the merge to a different reviewer bee. |
This was referenced Oct 2, 2026
Owner
Author
|
Seal for
If the seal is still wanted, rename the module first (for example For reference, a t27c from 2026-10-02 (not master's revision, so do not commit these values) gives |
This was referenced Oct 3, 2026
Merged
gHashTag
added a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Oct 3, 2026
… hold (Refs #5776) The reviewer needed a `claude setup-token` in the Keychain because the CLI's own OAuth login cannot refresh under launchd. It does not need Anthropic at all: `claude -p` is only the harness (its sandbox flags keep the agent read-only), and z.ai serves the same API. Measured 2026-10-04 on the five keys in ~/.claude/.env: glm-4.7-flash and glm-4.5-flash answer, free; every paid model answers [1113][Insufficient balance or no resource package]. So: - `--provider zai` (default; BEE_REVIEWER_PROVIDER): ANTHROPIC_BASE_URL is z.ai's Anthropic endpoint, model glm-4.7-flash, glm-4.5-flash as the CLI's fallback when the first is overloaded (1305). - Keys: ZAI_API_KEY, ZAI_API_KEY_2.. from the environment, then ZAI_KEY_N from ~/.claude/.env (BEE_ZAI_ENV_FILE names another file). Round-robin; a key z.ai refuses (1113, 401, 1302/1303) hands the same review to the next key; all refused is AgentUnavailable, which charges no head. - The agent sees one key as ANTHROPIC_AUTH_TOKEN, never the pool, and none of the desktop app's login or model settings. No key is ever logged. - `probe` sends one tiny turn per key: 5 of 5 answer under `env -i`. - `--provider claude` keeps the Keychain setup-token path. Dry run on two live pull requests: #5595 REQUEST_CHANGES in 5 turns / 50 s; #4498 contradicted itself (APPROVE plus a blocking-check line) and the runner's own gate called it incomplete, posting nothing. self-test: 85 checks, 0 failures. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5.5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
This was referenced Oct 3, 2026
gHashTag
added a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Oct 3, 2026
…s trend (Refs #5776) An APPROVE whose block only leaves something out -- no summary, no criterion line, a red check with no discounted-check line -- now gets the same one repair turn an answer with no block gets, told exactly what is missing and which checks are red. It may discount a check only where the review already said why; otherwise it must answer REQUEST_CHANGES. The corrected block replaces the old one (two blocks would be two verdicts). A block that contradicts itself (an unmet criterion, a blocking-check) gets no repair turn: that is a judgement. Measured on the live log of 2026-10-03: #5595 was thrown away whole as "red check(s) not discounted"; 4 of 7 live reviews ended without a usable verdict. `reviewer.py tick` (and `tri review tick`): one look -- health, queue by reason, reviews and merges since the last look, the merger's merges told from a person's by mergedBy.is_bot -- appended to ~/.local/state/t27-bees/ticks.jsonl, then what only a run of looks shows: work queued on three looks with no review, the same failure on two looks in a row (a repair that did not hold), approved and labelled pull requests not merged after two hours. It repairs nothing. `doctor_findings` is split out of `cmd_doctor` so tick reuses it unprinted. reviewer.py self-test: 130 checks, 0 failures. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5.5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
gHashTag
added a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Oct 3, 2026
…5776) Live, 2026-10-03T20:10Z: the head re-read before posting #5595's verdict got GraphQL's "HTTP 401: Requires authentication" on a valid keyring login; the next read two minutes later worked. The verdict -- six minutes of model time -- was dropped, nothing was recorded, and the head goes back in the queue. Every call through `Gh` is a read (writes go through the bot's token), so a transient failure is asked again after 5 s and 20 s. A REST 401 (a dead login) and a 404 fail at once. Four self-test checks; with the retry turned off, the two that need it fail. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5.5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
This was referenced Oct 3, 2026
gHashTag
added a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Oct 4, 2026
… no attempt (B18) (Refs #5776) When z.ai is overloaded (1305), the CLI falls back to the second flash model partway through a review. That review cannot be seconded, so it ends incomplete, and until now it also used up one of the head's two attempts. During the 23:32-00:21Z overload, #5781, #5783, #5820 and #5822 each took a fallback and ran out of attempts. They then sat waiting for a new push even though nothing in them had failed. head_history no longer counts an incomplete whose first review fell back. An agent-failed row still counts. The predicate is now one function, fell_back, and the fallback rate in stats uses it too. Replayed over the live rows, those four heads become reviewable again; #5595 and #5689 stay out because both of their failed tries were their own. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5.5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Closes #5591
Written by a bee on
queen-5591and published bytools/queen/publish.py. The branch itself is the bee's; the second commit is the coordination entry every pull request must add, which a bee has no way to know about.🤖 Generated with Claude Code