Skip to content

fix(id/web): re-nest nested-mark runs on save instead of fragmenting spans (#968) - #1026

Merged
dezren39 merged 2 commits into
mainfrom
queue/1173-968-nested-mark-emit
Oct 27, 2026
Merged

dezren39 merged 2 commits into
mainfrom
queue/1173-968-nested-mark-emit

Conversation

@dezren39

@dezren39 dezren39 commented Oct 26, 2026 •

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Fixes #968.

Problem

Adjacent ProseMirror runs are converted to a comrak AST one at a time, each in canonical rank order (link < strong < em < strikethrough < code), so neighbouring runs that share a mark could disagree about which shared mark is outermost. *em **strong** end* arrived as Emph, Strong→Emph, Emph and — because append_inline_child only merged siblings with an identical TOP wrapper (#953) — rendered as three fragmented sibling spans with &#32; boundary entities and multiplied delimiters.

Fix

append_inline_child now peels pure mark chains (wrapper → … → single non-wrapper leaf, exactly what create_marked_text builds) and tail-inserts the leaf (insert_marked_chain): the parent's tail wrapper is reused for whichever chain mark it carries, wherever that mark sits in the incoming chain, and the chain's remaining wrappers nest inside it. Runs sharing no mark with the tail append fresh. This subsumes the #953 identical-wrapper merge (the shared mark at position 0, recursively) and applies at all three append sites: the generic children loop, table cells, and footnote definitions.

Tests

Queue task 1173 (repo-health-code-pilot).


View with [code]smith Autofix with [code]smith
Need help on this PR? Tag @codesmith-bot with what you need.

…spans (#968)

Adjacent ProseMirror runs are converted to comrak AST one at a time,
each in canonical rank order, so neighbours sharing a mark could
disagree about which shared mark is outermost: '*em **strong** end*'
arrived as Emph, Strong->Emph, Emph and rendered as three fragmented
sibling spans with &#32; boundary entities.

append_inline_child now peels pure mark chains (wrapper -> ... ->
leaf, as create_marked_text builds them) and tail-inserts the leaf:
the parent's tail wrapper is reused for whichever chain mark it
carries, and the chain's remaining wrappers nest inside it. This
subsumes the #953 identical-wrapper merge and applies at all three
append sites (generic children, table cells, footnote definitions).

Tests: the 5 still-corrupt triage cases round-trip byte-identically
with a double round-trip fixpoint; the post-#999 clean set and
 #944/#953 cases are pinned as regression guards. Verified via the
standalone codec crate (67/67 module tests pass); full lib-test
compile relies on PR CI per the sandbox OOM note.
@dezren39
dezren39 requested a review from a team as a code owner October 26, 2026 23:12
@chatgpt-codex-connector

chatgpt-codex-connector Bot commented Oct 26, 2026 •

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Codex Review Summary

This comment shows the latest Codex review activity on this pull request.

Review Status Commit Review trigger
📝 Code Review ✅ Completed 2026-10-27T03:48:43.556217Z cdf990f New commits
ℹ️ About Codex in GitHub

Your team has set up Codex to review pull requests in this repo. Reviews are triggered when you

  • Open a pull request for review
  • Mark a draft as ready
  • Comment "@codex review" or "@codex security review".

Codex reacts with 👀 while any review is running, comments if it has suggestions, and reacts with 👍 once all reviews finish with no findings.

@coderabbitai

coderabbitai Bot commented Oct 26, 2026 •

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Warning

Review limit reached

You've used all free OSS reviews for now. Wait for the free limit to reset to keep reviewing this public repository.

Next included review available in 38 minutes.

Check out review usage here.

View limit details

Limit details: You’ve used the included review currently available.

Learn how review limits work.

Review configuration:

Run configuration
  • Source mode: Auto
  • Repository: Unavailable
  • Branch: Unavailable
  • File: No configuration file from this repository applied
  • Commit: Unavailable
  • Layers: defaults
  • Review profile: CHILL
  • Plan: Advanced
  • Run ID: ffa9374a-6896-4868-8272-745b0577d6d3
Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between 5709db9 and cdf990f.

Files selected for processing: 1
  • pkgs/id/src/web/markdown.rs
  • Autofix · Keep fixing CodeRabbit findings and required CI, and resolving merge conflicts

Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out.

❤️ Share

Comment @coderabbitai help to get the list of available commands.

…-mark-emit

# Conflicts:
#	pkgs/id/src/web/markdown.rs
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

id(web): nested marks corrupt on save — em/strike/code inside strong/em gain &#32; entities and multiplied delimiters, several non-fixpoint

1 participant