Work System: issue-creation pipeline has zero PII redaction — prompts and TELOS goal text land in issues verbatim #1825

What I found

The Work System's issue-creation pipeline pushes personal content into issue titles/bodies with no redaction anywhere:

• hooks/ReminderRouter.hook.ts — pastes the original user prompt verbatim into the issue body on every reminder/research/queue capture.
• LIFEOS/TOOLS/WorkSweep.ts::sweepSessions — embeds principal_stated_goal from session frontmatter verbatim.
• LIFEOS/TOOLS/WorkSweep.ts::sweepGoals — reads TELOS ## Active Goals and creates one issue per goal with the full goal text verbatim (financial, health, or otherwise sensitive goal content included).

Grepped WorkSweep.ts, ReminderRouter.hook.ts, and hooks/lib/work-config.ts for redact|scrub|denylist|pii — no matches. There's no boundary-level filter anywhere before content reaches the configured issue repo.

Why it matters

Whatever host WORK.REPO points at (GitHub, or per #1816 any future backend), once an issue is created its content is effectively permanent — closing an issue doesn't delete its title/body; removing content requires a separate deliberate admin action on both GitHub and Forgejo/Gitea. So this isn't a "fix it later" risk — anything sensitive that lands in an issue before the gap closes stays there.

Proposal

Two different content problems, two different fixes:

• Unpredictable free text (ReminderRouter's prompt capture, sweepSessions's principal_stated_goal) needs a boundary-level redaction filter — one chokepoint right before any issue-creating call, pattern-matching for PII (dollar amounts, account-like numbers, health/financial terms) — analogous to LifeOS's own Daemon skill SecurityFilter used for its public-profile export.
• Deliberate TELOS exports (sweepGoals) need a source-level opt-out, not redaction — scrubbing a goal like "retire in 2-3 years with financial security" would destroy the reason it's useful. A per-goal sync: false-style flag in TELOS, or simply not exporting goals by default, fits better.

Happy to put up a PR for the redaction-filter half if that's a direction you'd take a contribution on.