Update spec to not include hashes/size in snapshot metadata #465

Activity

1. vladimir-v-diaz

   added a commit that references this issue on Jul 6, 2017

   Fix for issue #465

   ...

   84713f3
2. vladimir-v-diaz commented on Jul 6, 2017

   

   vladimir-v-diaz

   on Jul 6, 2017

   Contributor

   More actions

   We need to also determine if it is necessary to list the hash and length of Snapshot in Timestamp.
   See https://github.com/theupdateframework/tuf/blob/904fa9b8df8ab8c632a210a2b05fd741e366788a/docs/tuf-spec.txt#L909-L913
3. JustinCappos commented on Jul 6, 2017

   

   JustinCappos

   on Jul 6, 2017 via email

   Member

   More actions

   The hash and length make sense to me. Why wouldn't we have the hash and length here? The version of the snapshot file makes less sense, but I don't see a major problem with it being there.

   …

   On Thu, Jul 6, 2017 at 4:59 PM, Vladimir Diaz ***@***.***> wrote: We need to also determine if it is necessary to list the hash and length of Snapshot in Timestamp. See https://github.com/theupdateframework/tuf/blob/ 904fa9b/docs/tuf-spec.txt#L909-L913 — You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread. Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub <#465 (comment)>, or mute the thread <https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/AA0XDygHQLkJQruvl8lIs_wo6hWVCFgOks5sLUqagaJpZM4OQJvn> .
4. vladimir-v-diaz

   added a commit that references this issue on Jul 7, 2017

   Merge pull request #466 from theupdateframework/vladimir-v-diaz-patch-4

   ...

   4763f2d
5. vladimir-v-diaz commented on Jul 11, 2017

   

   vladimir-v-diaz

   on Jul 11, 2017

   Contributor

   More actions

   Fixed in #466 and implemented in #469.
6. vladimir-v-diaz

   closed this as completedon Jul 11, 2017