You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
I have worked on this some. It seems the catalog number formatting is ultimately controlled by the CatalogNumFormatName field in the associated Collection. Is that correct?
Is the accession number the only other field (besides object formatters) that has user defined formatting? I would like to treat all formatting generically. What ultimately determines the formatter that is used for accession number? It doesn't seem to be controlled by the Collection table like the catalog number is.
Activity
benanhalt commentedon May 2, 2012
I have worked on this some. It seems the catalog number formatting is ultimately controlled by the
CatalogNumFormatNamefield in the associated Collection. Is that correct?Is the accession number the only other field (besides object formatters) that has user defined formatting? I would like to treat all formatting generically. What ultimately determines the formatter that is used for accession number? It doesn't seem to be controlled by the Collection table like the catalog number is.
Merge pull request #1 from benanhalt/iiif