Skip to content

add relnotes 1.99.0 - #163435

Merged
rust-bors[bot] merged 1 commit into
rust-lang:mainfrom
BoxyUwU:relnotes_1_99
Sep 30, 2026
Merged

rust-bors[bot] merged 1 commit into
rust-lang:mainfrom
BoxyUwU:relnotes_1_99

Conversation

@BoxyUwU

@BoxyUwU BoxyUwU commented Sep 28, 2026 •

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

View all comments

r? mark-simulacrum

cc @rust-lang/release

@rustbot

rustbot commented Sep 28, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator

RELEASES.md was changed. Upon merging, each section will be automatically synced with its corresponding GitHub releases, but only from the main branch.

If it's not already the case, make sure to also merge the changes in the main branch.

@rustbot rustbot added S-waiting-on-review Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties. T-release Relevant to the release subteam, which will review and decide on the PR/issue. labels Sep 28, 2026
@BoxyUwU

BoxyUwU commented Sep 28, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member Author

@rustbot ping relnotes-interest-group

@rustbot

rustbot commented Sep 28, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator

Hi relnotes-interest-group, this issue/PR could use some help in reviewing /
adjusting release notes. Could you take a look if available? Thanks <3

cc @alex-semenyuk @jieyouxu @joshtriplett @lcnr @traviscross @weihanglo

@rust-log-analyzer

This comment has been minimized.

Comment thread RELEASES.md Outdated
Comment thread RELEASES.md Outdated
Comment thread RELEASES.md Outdated
@rust-log-analyzer

This comment has been minimized.

Comment thread RELEASES.md Outdated
Comment thread RELEASES.md
Comment thread RELEASES.md
Comment thread RELEASES.md Outdated
Comment thread RELEASES.md Outdated
Comment thread RELEASES.md Outdated
Comment thread RELEASES.md Outdated
Comment thread RELEASES.md Outdated
Comment thread RELEASES.md Outdated
Comment thread RELEASES.md Outdated
Comment thread RELEASES.md Outdated
Comment thread RELEASES.md

@jieyouxu jieyouxu left a comment •

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Looks good after nits

View changes since this review

@weihanglo weihanglo left a comment •

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Thanks for consolidating all changes!

View changes since this review

Comment thread RELEASES.md Outdated
rust-bors Bot pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Sep 28, 2026
[stable] 1.99.0 release

https://forge.rust-lang.org/release/process.html#stable-pr

Cherry-picks current state of relnotes (#163435), ultimately the main branch will have the authoritative copy unless we rebuild artifacts for some reason.

r? me
Comment thread RELEASES.md Outdated
@BoxyUwU

BoxyUwU commented Sep 29, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member Author

@bors squash msg="add relnotes 1.99.0"

@rust-bors

This comment has been minimized.

Co-authored-by: Asger Hautop Drewsen <asger@tyilo.com>
Co-authored-by: Boxy <rust@boxyuwu.dev>
Co-authored-by: Mark Rousskov <mark.simulacrum@gmail.com>
Co-authored-by: 许杰友 Jieyou Xu (Joe) <39484203+jieyouxu@users.noreply.github.com>
@rust-bors

rust-bors Bot commented Sep 29, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

🔨 6 commits were squashed into da3a408.

@theemathas

theemathas commented Sep 29, 2026 •

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

@lcnr @jdonszelmann Does #158436 need release notes due to #161916?
And does #158447 need release notes due to #161913?

@weihanglo weihanglo left a comment •

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

@BoxyUwU

BoxyUwU commented Sep 30, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member Author

@bors r+ p=1 rollup

@rust-bors

rust-bors Bot commented Sep 30, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

📌 Commit da3a408 has been approved by BoxyUwU

It is now in the queue for this repository.

@rust-bors rust-bors Bot added the S-waiting-on-bors Status: Waiting on bors to run and complete tests. Bors will change the label on completion. label Sep 30, 2026
@rust-bors rust-bors Bot removed the S-waiting-on-review Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties. label Sep 30, 2026
JonathanBrouwer added a commit to JonathanBrouwer/rust that referenced this pull request Sep 30, 2026
add relnotes 1.99.0

r? mark-simulacrum

cc @rust-lang/release
JonathanBrouwer added a commit to JonathanBrouwer/rust that referenced this pull request Sep 30, 2026
add relnotes 1.99.0

r? mark-simulacrum

cc @rust-lang/release
JonathanBrouwer added a commit to JonathanBrouwer/rust that referenced this pull request Sep 30, 2026
add relnotes 1.99.0

r? mark-simulacrum

cc @rust-lang/release
@Mark-Simulacrum

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

@bors p=9

This needs to land by tomorrow morning (US Eastern) to be ready by the release, so bumping priority a bit more. I'm expecting it'll get pulled into rollups sufficient to make that happen (as per the above).

@JonathanBrouwer

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

The queue is not very large atm, let's reduce risk and just run this on its own after the PR that is currently running :)

@rust-bors

This comment has been minimized.

@rust-bors rust-bors Bot added merged-by-bors This PR was explicitly merged by bors. and removed S-waiting-on-bors Status: Waiting on bors to run and complete tests. Bors will change the label on completion. labels Sep 30, 2026
@rust-bors

rust-bors Bot commented Sep 30, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

☀️ Test successful - CI
Approved by: BoxyUwU
Duration: 3h 5m 58s
Pushing 21b707e to main...

@rust-bors
rust-bors Bot merged commit 21b707e into rust-lang:main Sep 30, 2026
14 checks passed
@rustbot rustbot added this to the 1.101.0 milestone Sep 30, 2026
@github-actions

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor
What is this? This is an experimental post-merge analysis report that shows differences in test outcomes between the merged PR and its parent PR.

Comparing 1625626 (parent) -> 21b707e (this PR)

Test differences

Show 2 test diffs

2 doctest diffs were found. These are ignored, as they are noisy.

Test dashboard

Run

cargo run --manifest-path src/ci/citool/Cargo.toml -- \
    test-dashboard 21b707e3f97e0b522ebd2f277a862339625ad83f --output-dir test-dashboard

And then open test-dashboard/index.html in your browser to see an overview of all executed tests.

Job duration changes

  1. test-x86_64-msvc-1: 1h 44m -> 2h 53m (+66.1%)
  2. test-x86_64-gnu-stable: 1h 39m -> 2h 39m (+60.6%)
  3. test-x86_64-gnu: 1h 33m -> 2h 19m (+50.0%)
  4. test-x86_64-gnu-llvm-22-3: 1h 16m -> 1h 52m (+46.2%)
  5. test-x86_64-gnu-gcc: 1h 19m -> 48m 53s (-38.1%)
  6. test-armhf-gnu: 1h 32m -> 58m 38s (-36.8%)
  7. test-aarch64-apple-macos-26-1: 2h 16m -> 1h 26m (-36.2%)
  8. test-x86_64-mingw-1: 2h 16m -> 3h 4m (+35.7%)
  9. dist-x86_64-netbsd: 1h 33m -> 1h (-35.5%)
  10. test-x86_64-gnu-nopt: 2h 28m -> 1h 37m (-34.2%)
How to interpret the job duration changes?

Job durations can vary a lot, based on the actual runner instance
that executed the job, system noise, invalidated caches, etc. The table above is provided
mostly for t-infra members, for simpler debugging of potential CI slow-downs.

@rust-timer

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator

Finished benchmarking commit (21b707e): comparison URL.

Overall result: ❌ regressions - no action needed

@rustbot label: -perf-regression

Instruction count

Our most reliable metric. Used to determine the overall result above. However, even this metric can be noisy.

mean range count
Regressions ❌
(primary)
- - 0
Regressions ❌
(secondary)
0.3% [0.3%, 0.3%] 1
Improvements ✅
(primary)
- - 0
Improvements ✅
(secondary)
- - 0
All ❌✅ (primary) - - 0

Max RSS (memory usage)

Results (primary 2.0%)

A less reliable metric. May be of interest, but not used to determine the overall result above.

mean range count
Regressions ❌
(primary)
2.0% [2.0%, 2.0%] 1
Regressions ❌
(secondary)
- - 0
Improvements ✅
(primary)
- - 0
Improvements ✅
(secondary)
- - 0
All ❌✅ (primary) 2.0% [2.0%, 2.0%] 1

Cycles

Results (primary 0.4%, secondary 14.5%)

A less reliable metric. May be of interest, but not used to determine the overall result above.

mean range count
Regressions ❌
(primary)
3.3% [3.3%, 3.3%] 1
Regressions ❌
(secondary)
22.8% [22.2%, 23.5%] 2
Improvements ✅
(primary)
-2.4% [-2.4%, -2.4%] 1
Improvements ✅
(secondary)
-2.2% [-2.2%, -2.2%] 1
All ❌✅ (primary) 0.4% [-2.4%, 3.3%] 2

Binary size

This perf run didn't have relevant results for this metric.

Bootstrap: 489.563s -> 487.961s (-0.33%)
Artifact size: 406.52 MiB -> 406.51 MiB (-0.00%)

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

merged-by-bors This PR was explicitly merged by bors. T-release Relevant to the release subteam, which will review and decide on the PR/issue.

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

10 participants