You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
@nick29581 You listed three issues #17293#17273 and #17295 but only the first among them is still open. Is that the reason why we still need feature(slicing_syntax) for this syntax?
@nodakai in general, feature gates are required until we are absolutely sure that a feature should be in Rust and stay in its current form. We are not there yet with slicing notation. In fact, we are tweaking the implementation and the surface syntax at the moment (see #19795).
Activity
alexcrichton commentedon Sep 11, 2014
Nominating, I believe this is a very important syntax to have.
alexcrichton commentedon Sep 11, 2014
cc #17177, this may just be a dupe of that.
aturon commentedon Sep 11, 2014
@alexcrichton This is #17177 :-)
Note that if we end up making
Vec<T>deref to[T], the need for the[]notation becomes less pressing.alexcrichton commentedon Sep 11, 2014
oops: cc #14983
pnkfelix commentedon Sep 11, 2014
We can add this syntax backwards-compatibly.
Assigning P-low, not 1.0 blocker.
nrc commentedon Sep 15, 2014
I am implementing
aturon commentedon Sep 15, 2014
@nick29581 Awesome!
nrc commentedon Sep 16, 2014
See #17293 and #17273 for some work left to do.
nrc commentedon Sep 16, 2014
and #17295
nodakai commentedon Dec 19, 2014
@nick29581 You listed three issues #17293 #17273 and #17295 but only the first among them is still open. Is that the reason why we still need
feature(slicing_syntax)for this syntax?nrc commentedon Dec 19, 2014
@nodakai in general, feature gates are required until we are absolutely sure that a feature should be in Rust and stay in its current form. We are not there yet with slicing notation. In fact, we are tweaking the implementation and the surface syntax at the moment (see #19795).
nodakai commentedon Dec 21, 2014
@nick29581 I see, so the slicing notation is tracked by 0439-cmp-ops-reform rather than 0198-slice-notation now.
nrc commentedon Dec 22, 2014
@nodakai I wouldn't say either RFC tracks slicing notation - both contain aspects of the design
Auto merge of rust-lang#17177 - hermannm:fix-run-lens-config, r=Veykril
Update cargo submodule
Auto merge of #158740 - Mark-Simulacrum:bump-version, r=Mark-Simulacrum