You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
pip install robotframework-selenium2library is awesome but unfortunately impossible w/o network access and problematic with some proxy configurations. The installation instructions should contain steps how to install the library and its dependencies manually.
If I remember correctly, not all dependencies have Windows installers, and thus everyone must install at least some package using the old-school python setup.py install style. It is thus easiest to explain installing all the dependencies, and possibly also the library itself, using that approach.
I wrote better installation instructions to README.rst and submitted them as pull request #261. As I wrote in the commit message to 1fb0158, I noticed that this project also has more detailed instructions in INSTALL.rst only after writing the new instructions. That file was just mentioned in the beginning of README.rst, not under its Installation section. Information in INSTALL.rst was also partly outdated.
Having detailed instructions both in README.rst and in INSTALL.rst obviously makes no sense. I think there are two possibilities:
Remove separate INSTALL.rst. There seems to be some good stuff we could move to the new instructions before removing it, though.
Move new instructions for INSTALL.rst, keeping the good parts of both. Remove detailed instructions from README.rst, but make link to INSTALL.rst more visible.
Any comments which approach to use? I can continue working with either and send a new pull request when done.
After thinking this a bit more, I would say it's better to keep installation instructions in README.rst and remove INSTALL.rst altogether. These instructions are anyway fairly short, and it would be convenient for users to have everything in one place both in GitHub front page and, if #254 is accepted, also in PyPI. It would also be easier to maintain just single file instead of two files.
Unless others disagree, I'll continue enhancing the instructions by removing INSTALL.rst and updating README.rst accordingly. Before removing the file, I'll see if there's anything worth keeping that should be moved to README.rst.
Activity
pekkaklarck commentedon Dec 30, 2013
I wrote better installation instructions to README.rst and submitted them as pull request #261. As I wrote in the commit message to 1fb0158, I noticed that this project also has more detailed instructions in INSTALL.rst only after writing the new instructions. That file was just mentioned in the beginning of README.rst, not under its Installation section. Information in INSTALL.rst was also partly outdated.
Having detailed instructions both in README.rst and in INSTALL.rst obviously makes no sense. I think there are two possibilities:
Remove separate INSTALL.rst. There seems to be some good stuff we could move to the new instructions before removing it, though.
Move new instructions for INSTALL.rst, keeping the good parts of both. Remove detailed instructions from README.rst, but make link to INSTALL.rst more visible.
Any comments which approach to use? I can continue working with either and send a new pull request when done.
pekkaklarck commentedon Jan 1, 2014
After thinking this a bit more, I would say it's better to keep installation instructions in README.rst and remove INSTALL.rst altogether. These instructions are anyway fairly short, and it would be convenient for users to have everything in one place both in GitHub front page and, if #254 is accepted, also in PyPI. It would also be easier to maintain just single file instead of two files.
Unless others disagree, I'll continue enhancing the instructions by removing INSTALL.rst and updating README.rst accordingly. Before removing the file, I'll see if there's anything worth keeping that should be moved to README.rst.
aaltat commentedon Aug 30, 2017
Do we still need this? We are writing better documentation for the library but is the manual installation really needed?
pekkaklarck commentedon Aug 30, 2017
No.