feat(preset): @primer monorepo preset

[setchy]

Changes

Monorepo preset for all things @primer

• https://github.com/primer
• https://primer.style/

Context

Please select one of the following:

• This closes an existing Issue, Closes: #
• This doesn't close an Issue, but I accept the risk that this PR may be closed if maintainers disagree with its opening or implementation

AI assistance disclosure

Did you use AI tools to create any part of this pull request?

Please select one option and, if yes, briefly describe how AI was used (e.g., code, tests, docs) and which tool(s) you used.

• No — I did not use AI for this contribution.
• Yes — minimal assistance (e.g., IDE autocomplete, small code completions, grammar fixes).
• Yes — substantive assistance (AI-generated non‑trivial portions of code, tests, or documentation).
• Yes — other (please describe):

Use of AI in replying to PR comments

Who answers review comments:

• @username will read and reply directly. Name the account.
• An agent will draft replies and @username will read them before they are posted. Name the account.
• Nobody has explicitly committed to replying.

Documentation (please check one with an [x])

• I have updated the documentation, or
• No documentation update is required

How I've tested my work (please select one)

I have verified these changes via:

• Code inspection only, or
• Newly added/modified unit tests, or
• No unit tests, but ran on a real repository, or
• Both unit tests + ran on a real repository

The public repository:

[github-actions]

Hi there,
When adding a new monorepo to the monorepo.json, please note that:

• Any dependency update(s) from this monorepo will be upgraded in a single PR
• If the dependencies are not all versioned identically (i.e. they're all at 16.0.5 and a release in one requires all being updated) this will lead to Immortal PRs
  • This is not be the intended behaviour, and is generally not recommended by Renovate maintainers. We only accept it if the packages strictly need to be updated together.

It is worth both the author of the PR and the reviewer confirming that this is the intended behaviour.