Skip to content

PEP 841: Adding Frozen Syntax to Make Immutable Types Optimizable - #5049

Open
corona10 wants to merge 9 commits into
python:mainfrom
corona10:pep-841
Open

PEP 841: Adding Frozen Syntax to Make Immutable Types Optimizable#5049
corona10 wants to merge 9 commits into
python:mainfrom
corona10:pep-841

Conversation

@corona10

@corona10 corona10 commented Jul 20, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Basic requirements (all PEP Types)

  • Read and followed PEP 1 & PEP 12
  • File created from the latest PEP template
  • PEP has next available number, & set in filename (pep-NNNN.rst), PR title (PEP 123: <Title of PEP>) and PEP header
    • Tip: find the next available number with pepotron — run uvx pepotron next (or pipx install pepotron then pep next)
  • Title clearly, accurately and concisely describes the content in 79 characters or less
  • Core dev/PEP editor listed as Author or Sponsor, and formally confirmed their approval
  • Author, Status (Draft), Type and Created headers filled out correctly
  • PEP-Delegate, Topic, Requires and Replaces headers completed if appropriate
  • Required sections included
    • Abstract (first section)
    • Copyright (last section; exact wording from template required)
  • Code is well-formatted (PEP 7/PEP 8) and is in code blocks, with the right lexer names if non-Python
  • PEP builds with no warnings, pre-commit checks pass and content displays as intended in the rendered HTML
  • Authors/sponsor added to .github/CODEOWNERS for the PEP

Standards Track requirements

  • PEP topic discussed in a suitable venue with general agreement that a PEP is appropriate
  • Suggested sections included (unless not applicable)
    • Motivation
    • Specification
    • Rationale
    • Backwards Compatibility
    • Security Implications
    • How to Teach This
    • Reference Implementation
    • Rejected Ideas
    • Open Issues
    • Acknowledgements
    • Footnotes
    • Change History
  • Python-Version set to valid (pre-beta) future Python version, if relevant
  • Any project stated in the PEP as supporting/endorsing/benefiting from the PEP formally confirmed such
  • Right before or after initial merging, PEP discussion thread created and linked to in Discussions-To and Post-History

@corona10
corona10 requested a review from a team as a code owner July 20, 2026 02:48
@corona10 corona10 changed the title pep-841: Adding Frozen Syntax to Make Immutable Types Optimizable PEP 841: Adding Frozen Syntax to Make Immutable Types Optimizable Jul 20, 2026
@read-the-docs-community

read-the-docs-community Bot commented Jul 20, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Comment thread peps/pep-0841.rst
Comment thread peps/pep-0841.rst Outdated
Comment thread peps/pep-0841.rst Outdated
Comment thread peps/pep-0841.rst Outdated
Comment thread peps/pep-0841.rst Outdated
Comment thread peps/pep-0841.rst Outdated
Comment thread peps/pep-0841.rst Outdated
corona10 and others added 2 commits August 6, 2026 21:29
Co-authored-by: Hugo van Kemenade <1324225+hugovk@users.noreply.github.com>
@corona10

corona10 commented Aug 6, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member Author

@hugovk I’d prefer to merge this PR as it stands, incorporating your suggestion, and then prepare for a second round of discussion. Would that be okay with you?

@hugovk

hugovk commented Aug 6, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Sure, merge away!

1 similar comment
@hugovk

hugovk commented Aug 6, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Sure, merge away!

@vstinner

vstinner commented Aug 6, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Can you please consider merging this PR? You're supposed to merge the PR before starting a discussion on a PEP.

It's strange that PEP 841 is being discussed whereas https://peps.python.org/pep-0841/ doesn't exist yet!

@brianschubert brianschubert added the new-pep A new draft PEP submitted for initial review label Aug 6, 2026
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

new-pep A new draft PEP submitted for initial review

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

7 participants