Repository navigation
Add initial support for license expression (PEP 639) #4706
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Changes from all commits
285d681
420766c
346bf17
31d8340
3744994
0d8f1f2
28baa9b
File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Jump to
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
| Original file line number | Diff line number | Diff line change |
|---|---|---|
| @@ -0,0 +1 @@ | ||
| Added initial support for license expression (`PEP 639 <https://peps.python.org/pep-0639/#add-license-expression-field>`_). -- by :user:`cdce8p` |
| Original file line number | Diff line number | Diff line change |
|---|---|---|
|
|
@@ -58,6 +58,7 @@ def apply(dist: Distribution, config: dict, filename: StrPath) -> Distribution: | |
| os.chdir(root_dir) | ||
| try: | ||
| dist._finalize_requires() | ||
| dist._finalize_license_expression() | ||
| dist._finalize_license_files() | ||
| finally: | ||
| os.chdir(current_directory) | ||
|
|
@@ -181,16 +182,19 @@ def _long_description( | |
| dist._referenced_files.add(file) | ||
|
|
||
|
|
||
| def _license(dist: Distribution, val: dict, root_dir: StrPath | None): | ||
| def _license(dist: Distribution, val: str | dict, root_dir: StrPath | None): | ||
| from setuptools.config import expand | ||
|
|
||
| if "file" in val: | ||
| # XXX: Is it completely safe to assume static? | ||
| value = expand.read_files([val["file"]], root_dir) | ||
| _set_config(dist, "license", _static.Str(value)) | ||
| dist._referenced_files.add(val["file"]) | ||
| if isinstance(val, str): | ||
| _set_config(dist, "license_expression", _static.Str(val)) | ||
| else: | ||
| _set_config(dist, "license", _static.Str(val["text"])) | ||
| if "file" in val: | ||
| # XXX: Is it completely safe to assume static? | ||
| value = expand.read_files([val["file"]], root_dir) | ||
| _set_config(dist, "license", _static.Str(value)) | ||
| dist._referenced_files.add(val["file"]) | ||
| else: | ||
| _set_config(dist, "license", _static.Str(val["text"])) | ||
|
Contributor
There was a problem hiding this comment. Choose a reason for hiding this commentThe reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more. I would prefer to flatten this nested
Member
Author
There was a problem hiding this comment. Choose a reason for hiding this commentThe reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more. I thought about this as well. However I decided to use to nesting to clearly separate the before / after PEP 639 cases. In a flattened list it just looks like they are equal which isn't the case. At some point, it might also make sense to add a DeprecationWarning for the legacy case which will be easier with the nested style. |
||
|
|
||
|
|
||
| def _people(dist: Distribution, val: list[dict], _root_dir: StrPath | None, kind: str): | ||
|
|
||

There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
So this mean that we need a follow-up PR for the
License-Expression, right?There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Correct. This PR was designed so that it itself didn't require a metadata_version bump. That could / should happen at a later point once all pieces are in place. I.e. setuptools has adopted version
2.3, the license files are stored in the correct folder and license expression parsing is handled correctly.