You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
{{ message }}
Repository navigation
how can I skip package with bad checksum?(in Release file and in file checksum are not equal on remote_repo) #1140
When I run pulp deb repository sync --name *** --remote ***
I recieve 'A file located at the url http://packages.linbit.com/public/dists/proxmox-8/drbd-9/pool/ktls-utils-dbgsym_0.10-2_amd64.deb failed validation due to checksum. Expected '10f931da9a6166ce09e2a6b0b56fd4710cc2a08f4747382099adbe75f32d9e7077a69d20cdb03f8990cc62f4b7d127b378e339d1455c042a7ed0f464c68d84a4', Actual 'fbf78d9e973d7d77a474d4b514ff56c8f62807179dd0389e8801638558452954fe8fa37d3e2a625b6401bbd5c83deaea3b484f542f3e4f65536ebac7fe937533''
By design there is currently no way. This is a case of the repo not passing validation. The expectation is to open a ticket with the person maintaining the repo and hopefully they will fix their repo soon.
If we wanted to provide an option to skip such packages, that would be a feature request. I will ask around other plugins what they do.
Activity
angryerr commentedon Aug 23, 2024
with repo for proxmox-7 all right
there is no such bad package.
to use
ALLOWED_CONTENT_CHECKSUMSis bad idea , I want anly skip this package (may by I can do this in database?)quba42 commentedon Aug 26, 2024
By design there is currently no way. This is a case of the repo not passing validation. The expectation is to open a ticket with the person maintaining the repo and hopefully they will fix their repo soon.
If we wanted to provide an option to skip such packages, that would be a feature request. I will ask around other plugins what they do.
quba42 commentedon Aug 26, 2024
I asked the pulp_rpm folks, and they assured me that the pulp_rpm behavior is the same as for pulp_deb in such cases.
They do have a feature request to skip individual packages: pulp/pulp_rpm#3469
If and when this feature request is implemented for pulp_rpm, I would revisit implementing an analogous feature for pulp_deb as well.