Skip to content

Consider using FastTreeSHAP? #41

Open

Description

@almostintuitive

https://engineering.linkedin.com/blog/2022/fasttreeshap--accelerating-shap-value-computation-for-trees
It looks like it's a drop-in replacement, which we'll start testing next week!

Activity

  1. almostintuitive commented on Jul 12, 2023

    @almostintuitive
    ContributorAuthor

    We have been using FastTreeSharp for over a month now, has excellent performance and is an order of mangitude smaller library than shap, which is for some reason, huge. the API is exactly the same, we definitely recommend switching over!

  2. JarneVerhaeghe commented on Sep 25, 2025

    @JarneVerhaeghe
    Collaborator

    Since PowerShap supports KernelShap and non-tree models, we still need to include the original SHAP library for those models. While adding FastTreeShap is an excellent idea, we'd need to add it to the dependency list and keep SHAP in there as well. I'll keep this issue open for later reference.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Metadata

Metadata

Assignees

No one assigned

    Labels

    No labels
    No labels

    Type

    No type

    Projects

    No projects

      Milestone

      No milestone

      Relationships

      None yet

      Development

      No branches or pull requests

      Issue actions