You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
We have been using FastTreeSharp for over a month now, has excellent performance and is an order of mangitude smaller library than shap, which is for some reason, huge. the API is exactly the same, we definitely recommend switching over!
Reacted by Michal Rzaca, Jarne Verhaeghe, Jonas Van Der Donckt, jmakov and Igor Pechersky
Since PowerShap supports KernelShap and non-tree models, we still need to include the original SHAP library for those models. While adding FastTreeShap is an excellent idea, we'd need to add it to the dependency list and keep SHAP in there as well. I'll keep this issue open for later reference.
Activity
almostintuitive commentedon Jul 12, 2023
We have been using FastTreeSharp for over a month now, has excellent performance and is an order of mangitude smaller library than shap, which is for some reason, huge. the API is exactly the same, we definitely recommend switching over!
JarneVerhaeghe commentedon Sep 25, 2025
Since PowerShap supports KernelShap and non-tree models, we still need to include the original SHAP library for those models. While adding FastTreeShap is an excellent idea, we'd need to add it to the dependency list and keep SHAP in there as well. I'll keep this issue open for later reference.