Skip to content

Add optional "explanation" field #4

Open

Description

@chriswblake

The model's intention is only to declare a user's proficiency and is unbiased of where it comes from. However, there are several situations where internal tracking may be helpful. (Learning systems, usage-history, etc.)

Suggestion

Provide recommendations in the schema to standardize such an offering, but make it optional and not impactful on the actual scores.

Activity

  1. converted this from a draft issue on Mar 3, 2026
  2. moved this from Todo to No status in Open Proficiency Taskson Mar 3, 2026
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Metadata

Metadata

Assignees

No one assigned

    Labels

    No labels
    No labels

    Type

    No type

    Projects

    Milestone

    No milestone

    Relationships

    None yet

    Development

    No branches or pull requests

    Issue actions