You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
I don't think it needs to be added. This tutorial does not have the goal of analysing the complete splitting scheme.
This is the job of: https://computationalphysiology.github.io/oasisx/splitting_schemes.html
where there also are references to several theoretical papers on the proposed method.
You can also find the improved method where one keep an extra term in the equation:
(the term that is dropped in this tutorial).
In the Navier stokes eq this becomes:
Please also note that this is an open source project. If you have a good way of formulating what you want to have on the web-page, you can simply modify the source code and add a pull request.
Do as you wish, but a boundary condition whose residual is huge in the first few steps, and stays large in the following, needs a comment, to the very least. This was confusing not only to me, but also to another colleague of mine.
Do as you wish, but a boundary condition whose residual is huge in the first few steps, and stays large in the following, needs a comment, to the very least. This was confusing not only to me, but also to another colleague of mine.
In general, when starting with a zero flow as initial condition, one sees these kind of «spikes» in the pressure/phi, as p_old is 0. This is not unique to this splitting scheme.
Activity
jorgensd commentedon Jan 3, 2025
I don't think it needs to be added. This tutorial does not have the goal of analysing the complete splitting scheme.
This is the job of: https://computationalphysiology.github.io/oasisx/splitting_schemes.html
where there also are references to several theoretical papers on the proposed method.
You can also find the improved method where one keep an extra term in the equation:



(the term that is dropped in this tutorial).
In the Navier stokes eq this becomes:
Please also note that this is an open source project. If you have a good way of formulating what you want to have on the web-page, you can simply modify the source code and add a pull request.
mcastel1 commentedon Jan 3, 2025
Do as you wish, but a boundary condition whose residual is huge in the first few steps, and stays large in the following, needs a comment, to the very least. This was confusing not only to me, but also to another colleague of mine.
jorgensd commentedon Jan 3, 2025
In general, when starting with a zero flow as initial condition, one sees these kind of «spikes» in the pressure/phi, as p_old is 0. This is not unique to this splitting scheme.