Skip to content

Fix the Commits panel's column widths when scrolling during interactive rebase or bisect - #6022

Merged
stefanhaller merged 9 commits into
masterfrom
column-layout-during-rebase
Sep 19, 2026
Merged

stefanhaller merged 9 commits into
masterfrom
column-layout-during-rebase

Conversation

@stefanhaller

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator

The commit list only renders the visible rows for performance reasons (see #3687), which means it also uses only the visible rows for determining the widths of the list's columns. In an interactive rebase, when you scroll down so that no rebase todos are visible any more, the author and subject columns would snap to the left, which looks ugly and distracting. A similar thing happened in half-screen mode when only commits from today are visible: today's commits use a shorter date format, so as you scroll down to make an older commit visible, the columns to the right of the date would move to the right to make room for the longer date.

Fix this by taking the width requirements of all commits into account, not just the visible ones, and pad the column texts to those widths. For the date we take a shortcut: measuring the widths of all commits would be too expensive, so we only format the oldest commit's date, on the assumption that this one is the least likely to be from today. This only works when the long time format is actually longer than the short one, and when the long format always results in the same width for all dates; both of these assumptions might be false when users reconfigure their gui.timeFormat or gui.shortTimeFormat configs (e.g. to include a week day), but for the default values of these it works.

stefanhaller and others added 9 commits September 19, 2026 09:54
Decolorise stores its result in a cache keyed by the string it was given,
but the lookup treats an empty result as a miss, so a string that
decolorises to nothing is recomputed on every call. Recomputing it means
compiling two regexes, and that costs 4534ns against 24.7ns for a string
the cache does answer for.

Empty cells are everywhere in the list panels, and RenderDisplayStrings
measures every cell twice, once to work out the column widths and once to
pad it. A commits panel showing 50 lines with one empty column spends
about 0.45ms of every render on this.

Read the cache with the two-value form, so that an empty result counts as
an answer, and compile the two regexes once at package level.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
…s styling

These three cells are built and styled in one step, so their width can
only be measured by stripping the styling off again. A later commit needs
those widths to reserve space for the columns they go into. Pull the text
out into getHashText, getActionText and a getBisectStatusText that no
longer styles what it returns, and apply the styling at the call site.

A commit with no hash, such as a "break" or "update-ref" todo, now gets an
empty hash cell instead of one holding nothing but colour codes. Nothing
can see the difference: both render as the same number of blank columns.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
A caller that asks for a padding of zero gets its string back unchanged,
but only after WithPadding has measured it, and measuring means a
Decolorise lookup and a width scan over the result. A later commit pads
four cells of every commit in the list, and asks for a padding of zero
for all four whenever no rebase or bisect is in progress and the date
column is hidden, so make that case cost nothing.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
formatExpected runs the expected output through strings.TrimSpace to get
rid of the newlines that the raw string literal starts and ends with, but
that also eats the indentation of the first line. A scenario whose first
line starts with an empty column can't express what it expects, and a
later commit adds two of those. Trim the newlines only.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
…ines need

The commits panel renders only the lines that are on screen, so the width
of a column follows what happens to be visible, and a column all of whose
visible lines are empty disappears altogether. Scrolling past the pending
rebase todos takes the action column away with them, and everything to its
right jumps to the left.

Cover the same problem for two more columns: the hash column, which goes
away while only hashless todos such as "update-ref" are on screen, and the
date column in the expanded commits panel, which is as narrow as the time
format while only commits from today are on screen.

This file is deliberately left un-gofumpt'd: gofumpt indents the body of
the commented-out block by a tab, which would fill the diff of the commit
that swaps the two blocks with whitespace-only changes.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
During an interactive rebase, scrolling down far enough that the pending
todos leave the screen makes the author and subject of every commit jump
to the left; scrolling back up makes them jump back. During a bisect the
column that holds "<-- current" and "?" comes and goes the same way, and
in the expanded commits panel the date column is only as wide as
gui.shortTimeFormat while nothing but today's commits is on screen.

A column is as wide as the widest string in it, and a column whose strings
are all empty is dropped altogether. The commits and sub-commits panels
render only the lines that are on screen, so those widths come from the
visible lines alone and follow the scroll position.

Pad the hash, bisect, action and date cell of every line to the width that
all the commits in the list need. A padded cell is no longer empty, so its
column is never dropped, and the column is already as wide as the whole
list needs, so its width no longer depends on what is visible.

The date column is the exception. Formatting the date of every commit on
every render costs too much, so it measures the oldest commit only. That
covers the conventional time formats; getReservedColumnWidths says what it
misses, and why it can never reserve width that no commit asks for.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
The reflog commits context slices the visible lines out itself and passes
only those, so the function has no way to look at the rest of the list. A
following commit needs the oldest entry to work out how much width the
date column needs. Take the whole list along with the range to render, the
way GetCommitListDisplayStrings already does.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
…ines need

The reflog panel renders only the lines that are on screen too, so the
expanded panel's date column is only as wide as gui.shortTimeFormat while
nothing but entries from today is visible, and the message of every entry
jumps to the left. A reflog reaches back in time, so scrolling crosses
that boundary soon enough.

GetReflogCommitListDisplayStrings had no tests at all, so cover the two
shapes it can return along the way.

This file is deliberately left un-gofumpt'd: gofumpt indents the body of
the commented-out block by a tab, which would fill the diff of the commit
that swaps the two blocks with whitespace-only changes.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
Pad the date of every line to the width that the oldest entry in the
reflog asks for, so that the column keeps its width as the user scrolls.
This is the same treatment the commits panel's date column gets, with the
same limits; getReservedColumnWidths spells them out.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
@stefanhaller stefanhaller added the bug Something isn't working label Sep 19, 2026
@stefanhaller
stefanhaller merged commit a1f1102 into master Sep 19, 2026
15 checks passed
@stefanhaller
stefanhaller deleted the column-layout-during-rebase branch September 19, 2026 08:59
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

bug Something isn't working

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant