Repository navigation
feat(example): add SDXL MXFP8 RTN workflow - #2562
Merged
Merged
Conversation
changwangss
force-pushed
the
feat/sdxl-mxfp8-example
branch
2 times, most recently
from
September 4, 2026 06:25
bbfde6c to
c4b52fd
Compare
changwangss
marked this pull request as ready for review
September 4, 2026 06:26
Signed-off-by: changwangss <chang1.wang@intel.com>
chensuyue
approved these changes
Sep 15, 2026
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Type of Change
feature
Description
Add a standalone Stable Diffusion XL MXFP8 example under
stable_diffusion/mxfp8. The example provides:iters=0anddisable_opt_rtn=TrueThe workflow targets
stabilityai/stable-diffusion-xl-base-1.0and keeps the existing Flux example unchanged.Expected Behavior & Potential Risk
Users can produce a complete fake-quantized Diffusers SDXL pipeline with MXFP8 pure RTN, then run single- or multi-GPU evaluation. No calibration dataset or tuning samples are required for quantization.
The change only adds a new example directory and does not modify library code or existing examples. Full model quantization is GPU- and resource-intensive.
How has this PR been tested?
main.pyanddataset_split.pyrun_quant.shandrun_benchmark.shAutoRoundConfigverification confirmingscheme=MXFP8,iters=0, anddisable_opt_rtn=Truegit diff --checkDependency Change?
No library dependency changes. The new example includes its own
requirements.txt.