Repository navigation
fix(website): the catalog refresh runs the checks its counts must pass - #1217
Merged
Merged
Conversation
… specs trinity#1176 refreshed public/t27/manifest.json (1577 -> 1737 specs, 12 -> 14 repositories) and left specs/catalog/onboarding.t27 stating the old counts. onboarding-from-spec refuses a snapshot that disagrees with the manifest it ships beside, so `prebuild` on main exits 1 and the apex publisher (ghashtag.github.io, run 36893486012) failed at Build. - write the nine counts the generator names, and MEASURED_AT - correct the prose the new numbers made false: "every remaining fail never parsed" -- six now parse and lose only Verilog - regenerate /llms.txt and /agents.t27 from the spec - t27-world-scan runs check:onboarding with the other catalog gates, so a refresh that moves the counts stops before it commits instead of after it reaches main Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5.5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
…check:silicon check:silicon (Website checks) fails on main since #1176: gf16_dot4 and gf16_matmul_top name GF16 and are in no table. Both consume the format (a dot-product unit and the board top around it) and declare nothing, so they join the use/convert/measure exclusions with reasons. The world scan now runs check:silicon beside check:onboarding. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5.5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
…MEASURED_AT, the corrected prose and the scan gate Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5.5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
github-actions Bot
added a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Oct 1, 2026
fix(website): the catalog refresh runs the checks its counts must pass (#1217) * fix(website): t27.ai stopped publishing when the catalog grew to 1737 specs trinity#1176 refreshed public/t27/manifest.json (1577 -> 1737 specs, 12 -> 14 repositories) and left specs/catalog/onboarding.t27 stating the old counts. onboarding-from-spec refuses a snapshot that disagrees with the manifest it ships beside, so `prebuild` on main exits 1 and the apex publisher (ghashtag.github.io, run 36893486012) failed at Build. - write the nine counts the generator names, and MEASURED_AT - correct the prose the new numbers made false: "every remaining fail never parsed" -- six now parse and lose only Verilog - regenerate /llms.txt and /agents.t27 from the spec - t27-world-scan runs check:onboarding with the other catalog gates, so a refresh that moves the counts stops before it commits instead of after it reaches main Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5.5 <noreply@anthropic.com> * fix(website): classify the two gf16 ports #1176 vendored; scan gates check:silicon check:silicon (Website checks) fails on main since #1176: gf16_dot4 and gf16_matmul_top name GF16 and are in no table. Both consume the format (a dot-product unit and the board top around it) and declare nothing, so they join the use/convert/measure exclusions with reasons. The world scan now runs check:silicon beside check:onboarding. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5.5 <noreply@anthropic.com> --------- Co-authored-by: Claude Opus 5.5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
This was referenced Oct 1, 2026
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
The apex publisher (gHashTag/ghashtag.github.io
publish-website.yml, run 36893486012, 2026-10-01 16:38Z) failed at Build:onboarding-from-spec: 9 problem(s). #1176 (t27 worlds: refresh the catalog) had movedpublic/t27/manifest.jsonto 1737 specs and 14 repositories, andspecs/catalog/onboarding.t27still said 1577 and 12. The same refresh leftcheck:siliconred on two vendored gf16 ports.#1212 has since written the counts and the two silicon exclusions; this branch merged it. What remains here is what #1212 did not do:
.github/workflows/t27-world-scan.ymlnpm run check:onboardingandnpm run check:siliconin Catalog gates. #1176 merged with Website checks red, because onlyT27 work reportis required. The refresh never ran either check, so the publish was the first place the disagreement surfaced. A refresh that moves the counts now stops before it commits.specs/catalog/onboarding.t27MEASURED_AT2026-10-01: #1212 kept 2026-09-24 beside the 2026-10-01 numbersqueen-rehearsal,gen_w312,run_v51_multiple,health_check,gen_mock,trios-mesh/tools/deploy)public/llms.txt,public/agents.t27Verified:
npm run prebuild:ciexit 0;onboarding-from-spec --checkup to date (10 tests, 54 asserts hold);check:siliconclassifies every spec; Website checks run 36900947748 green on the pre-merge head.🤖 Generated with Claude Code
{ "version": 1, "head_sha": "342451a266b355d19ee549e5d106b5833741bf38", "summary": "The t27.ai publish failed because a catalog refresh (#1176) moved the manifest without the onboarding snapshot, and the refresh job never ran the check that compares them. #1212 has since fixed the numbers; this adds check:onboarding and check:silicon to the refresh's own gates, and corrects the date and the prose the new numbers falsified.", "changes": [ ".github/workflows/t27-world-scan.yml: npm run check:onboarding and npm run check:silicon added to Catalog gates", "apps/website/specs/catalog/onboarding.t27: MEASURED_AT 2026-10-01; a paragraph recording the 2026-10-01 refresh; 'every remaining fail never parsed' replaced -- six specs now parse and fail only Verilog", "apps/website/public/llms.txt and public/agents.t27 regenerated by node scripts/onboarding-from-spec.mjs" ], "tests": [ { "command": "cd apps/website && npm ci && npm run prebuild:ci", "status": "passed", "result": "exit 0 for the whole chain, onboarding-from-spec included", "evidence": "local run; failing main build before #1212: gHashTag/ghashtag.github.io run 36893486012" }, { "command": "cd apps/website && node scripts/onboarding-from-spec.mjs --check && npm run check:silicon", "status": "passed", "result": "up to date, spec tests 10 asserts 54 all hold; every spec naming a verified format is classified", "evidence": "local run on 342451a26" }, { "command": "Website checks (workflow_dispatch on the branch)", "status": "passed", "result": "success on 7ef402eeb, before merging main", "evidence": "https://github.com/gHashTag/trinity/actions/runs/36900947748" } ], "limitations": [ "The world-scan gate is not exercised here; its next refresh that moves the counts will stop at check:onboarding until someone writes them, so the catalog can go stale where the site used to break.", "Website checks remains non-required on main, which is how #1176 merged red; this PR does not change branch protection." ], "tags": [ "Engineering", "Verification" ], "blog": { "title": "The gate was on the publish path, not on the job that changed its input", "summary": "A bot refresh moved the numbers a spec states about the corpus, merged with the comparing check red, and the site's publish was the first job to refuse it.", "outline": [ "The apex publish failed on a stale corpus snapshot that a bot refresh had invalidated.", "The counts were fixed in parallel; this change moves the comparing checks into the refresh itself and corrects the prose the new numbers falsified.", "Non-required checks let a red bot PR merge; whether Website checks should be required is left to the owner." ] } }