Skip to content

docs: Competitor Matrix — 10 MANET vendors with prices (2026-07-04) - #28

Closed
gHashTag wants to merge 1 commit into
mainfrom
feat/competitor-matrix-2026-07-04
Closed

gHashTag wants to merge 1 commit into
mainfrom
feat/competitor-matrix-2026-07-04

Conversation

@gHashTag

@gHashTag gHashTag commented Jul 4, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Owner

Что это

Сводная разведка по 10 конкурентам MANET / drone-mesh радио с характеристиками и ценами.

Файл: docs/COMPETITOR_MATRIX_2026-07-04.md (289 строк)

10 конкурентов

Segment A (100+ Mbps defense PoR, все USA):

  1. Persistent Systems MPU5 (Wave Relay)
  2. Rajant Kinetic Mesh (DX2/ES1/LX5/ME4)
  3. Silvus StreamCaster (SC4200/SC4400)
  4. TrellisWare TSM (TW-950/875/750)

Segment B (Blue UAS drone datalinks):
5. Doodle Labs Mesh Rider
6. Microhard pMDDL / pDDL
7. Mobilicom SkyHopper / MCU-30
8. Elistair Khronos (Silvus SC4200P inside)

Segment C (PLI / IoT kbit/s):
9. goTenna Pro X2 / X2m
10. Fraunhofer IIS mioty (TS-UNB)

15 полей на каждого

Vendor & product · Country · Frequency bands · Peak throughput (vendor) · Independent/field throughput · TX power · Range · Weight (module) · Power consumption · Waveform/protocol · Encryption/FIPS cert · Spec openness · SDK/API · Unit price (USD) · Notable deployments

Дисциплина

Каждая ячейка содержит inline markdown link на URL, реально извлечённый в research-сессии 2026-07-04. n.a. — где значение не подтверждается fetched source. quote only — где вендор не публикует цену на любой проверенной странице. Никаких значений из памяти или training data (honesty ledger).

Ключевые находки по ценам

Из 10 вендоров ни один не публикует list price на своей странице. Твёрдые USD-числа найдены только через government contracts и community reports:

Вендор Цена Источник
MPU5 ~$18k/radio USAF $5.1M / 280 units
MPU5 ~$50k/system GSA contract of 8
goTenna Pro X2 ~$1,200 Texas ANG TACP
Doodle Labs ~$1,500 Community/reseller
Microhard pMDDL $559–760 Reseller listings
Microhard pDDL OEM ~$238 Reseller listings
Elistair (platform) ~$22k–$140k Vendor guide range
Silvus, Rajant, TrellisWare, Mobilicom quote only все вендорские страницы

Наблюдение: pricing opacity сама по себе — input для D = V/F (если V не публикуется, procurement F нельзя независимо аудировать).

Связь с δ paper

Кормит WAVE_N3_AUDITABILITY_GAP:

  • Vendor-vs-field gap независимо корроборирован только для MPU5 (Boston Dynamics ~150 peak, TriadRF ~100 aggregate).
  • Rajant, TrellisWare, Mobilicom: zero third-party field data locatable — opacity хуже, чем у MPU5 (нет операторской counter-story).
  • FIPS: Silvus 140-3 L2 первым (Jan 2025), Rajant RiSM следом.
  • Spec openness: Fraunhofer mioty — единственный open ETSI standard (TS 103 357) во всём наборе.

Позиционирование Tri-Net (не бенчмарк, а карта)

Мы не играем в Segment A на throughput. Не гонимся за FIPS 140-3 L2 сейчас. Уникальны по осям openness + reproducible reference implementation. Ближайший сосед по духу — mioty (open ETSI), но с ambitions в Segment B по throughput.

Data gaps (честно помечено)

  • RX+TX Watt split: n.a. для TrellisWare, goTenna, Microhard.
  • Single-hop range: n.a. для Rajant, Microhard.
  • Independent field throughput: n.a. для Rajant, TrellisWare, Mobilicom.
  • FIPS cert #: n.a. для Microhard, goTenna, Mobilicom, mioty.

Draft PR — не мержить автоматически

Только для человеческого review. Merge — рукой пользователя (правило docs/AUTONOMOUS.md).

Anchor: φ² + φ⁻² = 3.

Comprehensive competitor sweep across 10 MANET/drone-mesh radio vendors:
Persistent MPU5, Rajant Kinetic Mesh, Silvus StreamCaster, TrellisWare TSM,
Doodle Labs Mesh Rider, goTenna Pro X2, Microhard pMDDL/pDDL, Mobilicom
SkyHopper/MCU-30, Elistair Khronos, Fraunhofer mioty.

Fields per entity: vendor/product, country, freq bands, peak throughput
(vendor claim), independent/field throughput, TX power, range, weight,
power consumption, waveform/protocol, encryption/FIPS certification,
spec openness, SDK/API, unit price (USD), notable deployments.

Every value cell links to a URL fetched during the 2026-07-04 wide-search
research session. n.a. used where value could not be confirmed from source
evidence. No values from memory or training data (honesty ledger).

Three market segments identified:
- Segment A: 100+ Mbps defense PoR (MPU5, Rajant, Silvus, TrellisWare)
- Segment B: Blue UAS drone datalinks (Doodle Labs, Microhard, Mobilicom, Elistair)
- Segment C: PLI/telemetry kbit/s (goTenna, mioty)

Feeds directly into WAVE_N3_AUDITABILITY_GAP δ paper: pricing opacity is
a D-metric input (unpublished V blocks procurement F audit); vendor-vs-
field gap independently corroborated only for MPU5 (Boston Dynamics,
TriadRF); Rajant/TrellisWare/Mobilicom have zero third-party field data
locatable — an opacity worse than MPU5.

Anchor: phi^2 + phi^-2 = 3.
@gHashTag

gHashTag commented Jul 4, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Owner Author

Stale: based on pre-merge state. Diff shows -2439 lines (would revert #32 m2_routing tests, #33 wire SSOT, #37 u32_be delegation). Competitor matrix content is superseded by merged BENCHMARK_VS_MANET_2026-07-04.md. Closing.

@gHashTag gHashTag closed this Jul 4, 2026
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant