Repository navigation
Port bootstrap/src/bitnet_irq.rs (Rust, 3 functions) to specs/port/bootstrap/src/bitnet_irq.t27 - #6725
Open
gHashTag wants to merge 3 commits into
Open
Port bootstrap/src/bitnet_irq.rs (Rust, 3 functions) to specs/port/bootstrap/src/bitnet_irq.t27#6725gHashTag wants to merge 3 commits into
gHashTag wants to merge 3 commits into
Conversation
…rq.t27 - Add is_valid_verilog_ident function to validate Verilog identifiers - Add resolve_ident function to return valid candidate or default - Add build_interrupt_controller function with undefined body (ports decision logic) - Add 3 test blocks covering the core logic of each function Closes #6128
…rq.t27 Add the three required functions: - is_valid_verilog_ident: validates Verilog identifier format - resolve_ident: returns valid candidates or falls back to default - build_interrupt_controller: resolves module name (I/O part undefined as per requirements) Add three test blocks covering validation, resolution, and name resolution logic. Closes #6128
A pull request must add exactly one docs/now entry and a bee has no way to know that: its brief names a boundary file and acceptance criteria, and docs/now/ is neither. The publisher adds it rather than failing the gate. Closes #6128 Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
This was referenced Oct 6, 2026
![t27-bees[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/5166765?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Reviewer bee verdict for head b4e2aa9c911b946cf88c32876578785f2dd223a6 (tools/bees/reviewer.py, zai glm-4.7-flash, glm-4.5-flash, 4 turns, 58 s).
BEE-VERDICT: REQUEST_CHANGES
summary: Review ended without verdict, verification statement provided instead
criterion: "Review completeness" -- unmet -- Review statement incomplete, no final approval/disapproval
Evidence
Now I'll verify the original file to ensure the porting is accurate:
This was referenced Oct 6, 2026
This was referenced Oct 6, 2026
Merged
This branch has not been deployed
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
2 participants
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Closes #6128
Written by a bee on
queen-6128and published bytools/queen/publish.py. The branch itself is the bee's; the second commit is the coordination entry every pull request must add, which a bee has no way to know about.🤖 Generated with Claude Code