Repository navigation
Port scripts/tri_loop/t27b_rules.py (Python, 7 functions) to specs/port/scripts/tri_loop/t27b_rules.t27 - #6252
Conversation
…7b_rules.t27 Re-authors the t27b steward's plumbing module (#6210) as a .t27 spec: 7 functions, one per name the task lists, each carrying the original's decisions as pure code with the world passed in as parameters. - _cache_dir: XDG_CACHE_HOME when set to a non-empty value, else the home fallback (Python's `or` treats unset and empty the same); the path join stays with the caller. - _build: read the generated C first (unreadable is RulesUnavailable even when a cached library exists), reuse the cached shared library when it exists, and a failing compile is RulesUnavailable; the platform picks dylib or so. The hash-named cache file and the compiler's stderr need string building and SHA-256, which t27 has no construct for (named in the spec header), so the caller names the file and truncates the stderr. - lib: readiness -- already loaded, or a fresh successful build. - verdict: the lab's verdict strings map to the spec's codes in order; an unknown string is an error, never a guess. - delta: the compiled delta_code maps to the spec's transition name; code 0 is Python's None; the ctypes call stays with the caller. - is_red: the name must be one of the spec's five transitions; the red answer is the compiled rules', a parameter here. - pct: tenths split into the whole part and the one decimal digit; the '.'-joined text needs string building (named in the spec header), so the caller joins them. 17 tests assert the values and the edge cases the original handles; every function is covered. t27c parse, typecheck and test-report are clean. Closes #6210
A pull request must add exactly one docs/now entry and a bee has no way to know that: its brief names a boundary file and acceptance criteria, and docs/now/ is neither. The publisher adds it rather than failing the gate. Closes #6210 Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
![t27-bees[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/5166765?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Reviewer bee verdict for head f0c8b93f72fecc684d13a14b8351c8723fa70ba2 (tools/bees/reviewer.py, zai glm-4.7-flash, 5 turns, 134 s; then glm-4.5-flash, 9 turns, 98 s).
BEE-VERDICT: REQUEST_CHANGES
summary: Successfully ported 7 Python functions to .t27 with all acceptance criteria met
criterion: "Port scripts/tri_loop/t27b_rules.py (Python, 7 functions) to specs/port/scripts/tri_loop/t27b_rules.t27" -- met -- All 7 functions ported with 17 tests passing, code generates 263 lines with 0 unimplemented
discounted-check: Check L1 TRACEABILITY -- The gen/c/tri/t27b/steward.c modification is pre-existing on master and unrelated to this PR (only docs/ and specs/port/ files added)
blocking-check: coverage -- Cannot be evaluated as it's queued on master
blocking-check: spec-guards -- Cannot be evaluated as it's queued on master
Evidence
The first review (glm-4.7-flash) approved this head. An approval needs a second model to agree on its own, and this second review (glm-4.5-flash) did not.
Based on my analysis of the pull request and the evidence provided, here's my assessment:
Evidence Summary
Acceptance Criteria Verification (All PASSED)
- File existence:
test -f specs/port/scripts/tri_loop/t27b_rules.t27 && echo present✓ prints "present" - 7 functions ported:
grep -cE '^\s*(pub )?fn (_cache_dir|_build|lib|verdict|delta|is_red|pct)\('✓ prints "7" - No unimplemented code:
grep -c 'not yet implemented' /tmp/t27-gen.zig✓ prints "0" - Generated code length:
t27c gen | wc -l✓ prints "263" (more than 12) - File parses:
t27c spec-status✓ prints "IMPLEMENTED" (not "NOPARSE") - Tests present:
grep -c 'test'✓ prints "17" (at least 7) - No blocked tests:
t27c test-report | grep -c BLOCKED✓ prints "0"
Red Checks Analysis
-
Check L1 TRACEABILITY - FAILURE
- Reason: "L2 GENERATION VIOLATION: The following files under gen/ were modified directly: M gen/c/tri/t27b/steward.c"
- Assessment: This appears to be a pre-existing issue, NOT introduced by this PR. The diff only shows two new files: the documentation entry and the new spec file
specs/port/scripts/tri_loop/t27b_rules.t27. No modifications to gen/ files are in this PR.
-
coverage - FAILURE (queued on master, cannot verify)
- Assessment: Cannot be evaluated as it's queued on master.
-
spec-guards - FAILURE (queued on master, cannot verify)
- Assessment: Cannot be evaluated as it's queued on master.
Key Findings
- The port successfully converts all 7 required functions from Python to .t27
- The generated code compiles and all tests pass
- The change respects the boundary: only creates
specs/port/scripts/tri_loop/t27b_rules.t27as required - The gen/ file modification mentioned in the L1 check is NOT part of this PR's changes
- The documentation file is automatically generated by the publisher, not the bee
The L1 TRACEABILITY failure appears to be a false positive - it's detecting changes that already exist on master but are unrelated to this porting task. The actual porting work is complete and correct.
2 participants
Closes #6210
Written by a bee on
queen-6210and published bytools/queen/publish.py. The branch itself is the bee's; the second commit is the coordination entry every pull request must add, which a bee has no way to know about.🤖 Generated with Claude Code