[kasperk81]

to unblock linux-musl test in installer dotnet/installer#15228 (comment)

[ghost]

I couldn't figure out the best area label to add to this PR. If you have write-permissions please help me learn by adding exactly one area label.

[kasperk81]

@marcpopMSFT

[ViktorHofer]

@kasperk81 the .NET Framework leg is failing.

[kasperk81]

crossgen2.exe" exited with code -1073741819.

don't think this change can cause crossgen2 crash like that. anyways, sync'd main to rerun ci.

[kasperk81]

full framework leg passed.

An update for template package 'Microsoft.TemplateEngine.Samples::8.0.100-alpha.1.23066.9' is available.

in template leg isn't related (it will be fixed once #29967 is merged)

[ViktorHofer]

in template leg isn't related (it will be fixed once #29967 is merged)

Any idea why this is happening in main?

[ViktorHofer]

/azp run dotnet-sdk-public-ci

[azure-pipelines]

Azure Pipelines successfully started running 1 pipeline(s).

[ViktorHofer]

Ah, we should probably add the --no-update-check Disables checking for the template package updates when instantiating a template. flag to the test invocations. Will do that in a separate PR.

[ViktorHofer]

@dotnet/templating-engine-maintainers https://github.com/dotnet/templating/blob/3b7bc2c69f41dd5205b850632b0f76c457254010/tools/Microsoft.TemplateEngine.Authoring.TemplateVerifier/VerificationEngine.cs#L340-L344 should probably pass the --no-update-check to the dotnet new <template-name> command.

A test failed here in this PR because the template samples package was installed but then later when instantiating the templates, the update checks detected a newer templates sample package being available in the feeds:

1 The template "Contoso Sample 06" was created successfully.
      + 
      + An update for template package 'Microsoft.TemplateEngine.Samples::8.0.100-alpha.1.23066.9' is available.
      + To update the package use:
      +    dotnet new install Microsoft.TemplateEngine.Samples::8.0.100-alpha.1.23067.1

Log: dotnet-new.IntegrationTests_net8.0_x64.log

[kasperk81]

@ViktorHofer now there is a new pr #29969 so it is complaining about the next version

[YuliiaKovalova]

I am taking a look.