Repository navigation
Fix a couple of issues when using textual PGO input - #72773
Merged
jakobbotsch merged 2 commits intoJul 27, 2022
Merged
Conversation
The textual PGO format currently just describes methods by name and does not include signature information/generic instantiations. This means we may see various edge cases here.This particular case would hit asserts when the JIT started asking the runtime questions about this MD.
ghost
added
the 
jakobbotsch
changed the title
AndyAyersMS
approved these changes
Jul 26, 2022
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to subscribe to this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
The textual PGO format currently just describes methods by name and does
not include signature information/generic instantiations. This means we
may see various edge cases here. These particular cases would hit asserts.