You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
I'm pretty sure that even a simple wrapper around ConcurrentDictionary<T, byte> would be useful. There must be many codebases out there that either implement their own ConcurrentHashSet<T> or use ConcurrentDictionary<T, byte> as a workaround.
I don't believe much has changed since the original decision closing #39919 (comment) was made. Adding a new collection type isn't free -- both from a design and a maintenance perspective -- and frankly this doesn't seem to meet the bar given such an obvious workaround is already available.
Activity
dotnet-policy-service commentedon Sep 15, 2026
Tagging subscribers to this area: @dotnet/area-system-collections
See info in area-owners.md if you want to be subscribed.
eiriktsarpalis commentedon Sep 16, 2026
I don't believe much has changed since the original decision closing #39919 (comment) was made. Adding a new collection type isn't free -- both from a design and a maintenance perspective -- and frankly this doesn't seem to meet the bar given such an obvious workaround is already available.