[dezren39]

Summary

Phase 14 plan: .opencode/plans/phase-14-close-out.md. Docs only, no code changes.

Theme: close-out. Finish the Phase 12 slices that are half on main, record the numbers later phases are measured against, add the proving tests Phases 9 and 10 promised, and build the two foundations Phase 13 waits on: the F12.4 provider registry and the F12.6 audit log. It follows the same format as the Phase 11-13 plans: goal, why this theme, scope and non-goals, evidence, exit table, architecture, security, F14.x workstreams with exit criteria, sequencing, acceptance, risks, open questions.

The reasoning, with evidence in the plan:

• The Phase 13 gates (F12.4 and F12.6 for F13.7 id: Phase 13 F13.7 client-side capability providers under the ceiling model #789; F11.9 id(world): F11.9 bytes-per-frame baseline table #542 for F13.4/F13.5 id: Phase 13 F13.4 presentation capability tiers with in-band terminal detection #786/id: Phase 13 F13.5 kitty keyboard protocol on the raw input path #787) belong to no phase.
• Phase 12 added BuilderInstalled and Forked journal entries while JOURNAL_VERSION stayed 1, against its own "F11.12 first" rule (Define rollback compatibility for world profile journal entries #227).
• Half-finished slices are live on main: id: F12.1 apply wiring — module install + schedules reconciliation #807, id(world-manifest): PR #801 — plan() treats omitted grants/ceiling/schedules as authoritative, contradicting 'empty fields are left alone' (omitted ceiling widens to whole catalog) #817, id(world-manifest): PR #801 — 'id world apply' prints 'applied N step(s)' for steps it explicitly did not apply, and diff/plan run against a fabricated seed=0 / empty-schedules state #818, the id(world): F12.2 world forking and templates #556 CLI, and an F12.3 frame-wiring gap.
• The Phase 9/10 verification debt is broken down into items (id phase-9/10: verification debt — delivered faster than verified, no dedicated issues carry it #796, id phase-9: a joiner's resize (up to 500x200) can permanently poison a world via the guest layout() call exceeding presentation_bytes #811, id phase-10: the world directory feed was not built — id world list --json is admin-only, has no presence counts, and 'open' means loaded-in-memory #812, id phase-9: Roc library expect() tests are never run — no 'roc test' wired into CI, flake.nix or the justfile #813).

F14.x → tracking issue

Item	Issue
F14.1 journal format (F11.12)	#227
F14.2 joiner resize clamp	#811
F14.3 manifest semantics / honest apply	#817, #818
F14.4 manifest apply wiring	#807
F14.5 fork over the wire	#556
F14.6 builder/moderator frames	#835 (new)
F14.7 bytes-per-frame (F11.9)	#542
F14.8 benchmarks (F11.8)	#539
F14.9 host metrics (F11.7)	#553
F14.10 Roc expect tests in CI	#813
F14.11 pinned Roc compiler (F11.18)	#541
F14.12 smaller modules (F11.15)	#555
F14.13 example migration	#565
F14.14 replay self-check (F11.16)	#544
F14.15 host-event retention	#242
F14.16 Phase 9/10 proving tests	#796
F14.17 DoS probe harness (F12.18)	#560
F14.18 fast lane (F11.4) + tracker fix	#551
F14.19 directory feed remainder	#812
F14.20 provider registry (F12.4)	#534 D1-022
F14.21 audit log (F12.6)	#534 D1-024
F14.22 signed revision replication	#792

Out of scope and still in Phase 12: #557, #558, #805, #806, and F12.5/7/8/9/10/14/17. All Phase 13 items (#783–#790) stay in Phase 13.

Do not merge yourself: Muse reviews and merges.

[chatgpt-codex-connector]

Codex Review Summary

This comment shows the latest Codex review activity on this pull request.

Review	Status	Commit	Review trigger
📝 Code Review	✅ Completed 2026-10-25T05:46:25.799476Z	ee67188	PR opened

ℹ️ About Codex in GitHub

Your team has set up Codex to review pull requests in this repo. Reviews are triggered when you

• Open a pull request for review
• Mark a draft as ready
• Comment "@codex review" or "@codex security review".

Codex reacts with 👀 while any review is running, comments if it has suggestions, and reacts with 👍 once all reviews finish with no findings.

[coderabbitai]

Caution

Review failed

The pull request is closed.

Finishing Touches

🧪 Generate unit tests (beta)

• Commit to this branch
• Create a new PR

• Autofix · Keep fixing CodeRabbit findings and required CI, and resolving merge conflicts

Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out.

❤️ Share

• X
• Mastodon
• Reddit
• LinkedIn

_{Comment @coderabbitai help to get the list of available commands.}