Skip to content

fix(mcpx): refuse non-finite ParseBytes spellings explicitly (#3521) - #4788

Merged
dezren39 merged 1 commit into
mainfrom
queue/6147-3521-parsebytes-nonfinite
Nov 3, 2026
Merged

dezren39 merged 1 commit into
mainfrom
queue/6147-3521-parsebytes-nonfinite

Conversation

@dezren39

@dezren39 dezren39 commented Nov 3, 2026 •

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Residual of #3521 after triage task 5496 (queue task 6147).

Problem: ParseBytes refused non-finite spellings only incidentally — NaN via implementation-defined float→int conversion landing in the n<0 check, infinities via the 2^63 magnitude check. No regression test named a non-finite spelling, so a future refactor to float-side comparisons (which NaN defeats) would regress silently.

Change (pinned scope, no finite-behavior change):

Tests:

  • Targeted: TestParseBytesRefusesNegativeAndOverflowingSizes, TestByteSizesAcceptBothDecimalAndBinarySuffixes — PASS.
  • Full ./internal/settings/: only 5 failures, all proven pre-existing on pristine origin/main (TestEveryDocumentHasAChapter, TestNoUndeclaredEnvRead, TestEverySettingHasAnEffectProbeOrAnExemption, TestTheScriptEnvironmentIsWhatTheCodeSets, TestTheEnvironmentDocIsCurrent) — unrelated to this change.

Closes #3521.


Autofix with [code]smith
Open in [code]smith · Need help on this PR? Tag @codesmith-bot with what you need.

ParseBytes refused NaN/Inf only incidentally (float-to-int conversion
for NaN, magnitude check for infinities). Add an explicit
math.IsNaN/IsInf guard naming the offending value, and name the
non-finite spellings (bare and suffixed) in the refusal test table and
the Validate loop so a future float-side refactor regresses loudly.
@dezren39
dezren39 requested a review from a team as a code owner November 3, 2026 07:48
@chatgpt-codex-connector

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Codex Review Summary

This comment shows the latest Codex review activity on this pull request.

Review Status Commit Review trigger
📝 Code Review ⚠️ Failed 2026-11-03T07:48:11.028848Z
We couldn’t complete this review. Comment @codex review to try again.
8643e8a PR opened
ℹ️ About Codex in GitHub

Your team has set up Codex to review pull requests in this repo. Reviews are triggered when you

  • Open a pull request for review
  • Mark a draft as ready
  • Comment "@codex review" or "@codex security review".

Codex reacts with 👀 while any review is running, comments if it has suggestions, and reacts with 👍 once all reviews finish with no findings.

@coderabbitai

coderabbitai Bot commented Nov 3, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Warning

Review limit reached

You've used all free OSS reviews for now. Wait for the free limit to reset to keep reviewing this public repository.

Next included review available in 17 minutes.

Check out review usage here.

View limit details

Limit details: You’ve used the included review currently available.

Learn how review limits work.

Review configuration:

Run configuration
  • Source mode: Auto
  • Repository: Unavailable
  • Branch: Unavailable
  • File: No configuration file from this repository applied
  • Commit: Unavailable
  • Layers: defaults
  • Review profile: CHILL
  • Plan: Advanced
  • Run ID: c74f7121-cd1a-4b77-a313-261c71cd86cd
Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between 9eee21e and 8643e8a.

Files selected for processing: 2
  • pkgs/mcpx/internal/settings/registry_test.go
  • pkgs/mcpx/internal/settings/value.go
  • Autofix · Keep fixing CodeRabbit findings and required CI, and resolving merge conflicts

Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out.

Share

CodeRabbit Verify

  • Run CodeRabbit Verify to test the changes in this pull request.

@chatgpt-codex-connector

Copy link
Copy Markdown

You have reached your Codex usage limits for code reviews. You can see your limits in the Codex usage dashboard.
To continue using code reviews, you can upgrade your account or add credits to your account and enable them for code reviews in your settings.

@dezren39
dezren39 merged commit eeb8764 into main Nov 3, 2026
2 checks passed
@dezren39
dezren39 deleted the queue/6147-3521-parsebytes-nonfinite branch November 3, 2026 08:24
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

1 participant