Skip to content

Fix nix ci failure for mcpx markdown check - #2542

Merged
dezren39 merged 1 commit into
queue/3227-1932-session-keysfrom
queue/3227-1932-session-keys-16331360631912816235-16419277735437437034
Oct 30, 2026
Merged

dezren39 merged 1 commit into
queue/3227-1932-session-keysfrom
queue/3227-1932-session-keys-16331360631912816235-16419277735437437034

Conversation

@dezren39

@dezren39 dezren39 commented Oct 30, 2026 •

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Fixes a failing CI run by excluding the generated pkgs/mcpx/docs/configuration.md file from treefmt.toml and restoring its generated markdown format (without prettier padding). The test TestTheDocumentationListsEverySetting requires a byte-for-byte match with the generated content.


PR created automatically by Jules for task 16419277735437437034 started by @dezren39


View with [code]smith Autofix with [code]smith
Need help on this PR? Tag @codesmith-bot with what you need.

This file is generated from the settings registry and `TestTheDocumentationListsEverySetting` compares it byte-for-byte. The `-update` regeneration is the correct fix and it must NOT be run through prettier afterwards, as prettier's table padding is what broke the test.

I have regenerated the markdown and added it to the `treefmt.toml` excludes.

Co-authored-by: dezren39 <11225574+dezren39@users.noreply.github.com>
@google-labs-jules

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

👋 Jules, reporting for duty! I'm here to lend a hand with this pull request.

When you start a review, I'll add a 👀 emoji to each comment to let you know I've read it. I'll focus on feedback directed at me and will do my best to stay out of conversations between you and other bots or reviewers to keep the noise down.

I'll push a commit with your requested changes shortly after. Please note there might be a delay between these steps, but rest assured I'm on the job!

For more direct control, you can switch me to Reactive Mode. When this mode is on, I will only act on comments where you specifically mention me with @jules. You can find this option in the Pull Request section of your global Jules UI settings. You can always switch back!

New to Jules? Learn more at jules.google/docs.


For security, I will only act on instructions from the user who triggered this task.

@coderabbitai

coderabbitai Bot commented Oct 30, 2026 •

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Important

Review skipped

Auto reviews are disabled on base/target branches other than the default branch.

Please check the settings in the CodeRabbit UI or the .coderabbit.yaml file in this repository. To trigger a single review, invoke the @coderabbitai review command.

Run configuration
  • Source mode: Auto
  • Repository: Unavailable
  • Branch: Unavailable
  • File: No configuration file from this repository applied
  • Commit: Unavailable
  • Layers: defaults
  • Review profile: CHILL
  • Plan: Advanced
  • Run ID: e23d405d-9f8c-481a-962b-7c1de4f4cdef

You can disable this status message by setting the reviews.review_status to false in the CodeRabbit configuration file.

Use the checkbox below for a quick retry:

  • 🔍 Trigger review
  • Autofix · Keep fixing CodeRabbit findings and required CI, and resolving merge conflicts

Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out.

❤️ Share

Comment @coderabbitai help to get the list of available commands.

Base automatically changed from queue/3227-1932-session-keys-16331360631912816235 to queue/3227-1932-session-keys October 30, 2026 04:44
@dezren39
dezren39 marked this pull request as ready for review October 30, 2026 04:46
@dezren39
dezren39 requested a review from a team as a code owner October 30, 2026 04:46
@dezren39
dezren39 merged commit 74d4813 into queue/3227-1932-session-keys Oct 30, 2026
8 checks passed
@dezren39
dezren39 deleted the queue/3227-1932-session-keys-16331360631912816235-16419277735437437034 branch October 30, 2026 04:46
@chatgpt-codex-connector

chatgpt-codex-connector Bot commented Oct 30, 2026 •

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Codex Review Summary

This comment shows the latest Codex review activity on this pull request.

Review Status Commit Review trigger
📝 Code Review ✅ Completed 2026-10-30T04:47:40.030970Z f491bdf Draft marked ready
ℹ️ About Codex in GitHub

Your team has set up Codex to review pull requests in this repo. Reviews are triggered when you

  • Open a pull request for review
  • Mark a draft as ready
  • Comment "@codex review" or "@codex security review".

Codex reacts with 👀 while any review is running, comments if it has suggestions, and reacts with 👍 once all reviews finish with no findings.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant