Skip to content

Cache replace strategy  #4

Description

@windscope

1
For this dilemma:

  1. if we cache table a, table b, table a.join.b
  2. a and b are much less than the a.join.b, what cache replacement strategy is going to take?

2
For this dilemma:

  1. cache table a.join.b, table a and table b are in disk
  2. table a and table b can be filtered a lot from the predicate. a.join.b is very large
    Choose which?

A solution for both of these dilemma is a sophisticated cost estimator.

Activity

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Metadata

Metadata

Assignees

No one assigned

    Labels

    No labels
    No labels

    Projects

    No projects

      Milestone

      No milestone

      Relationships

      None yet

      Development

      No branches or pull requests

      Issue actions