feat: add durable issue development loop#106
Draft
codeacme17 wants to merge 15 commits into
Draft
Conversation
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Summary
Adds a first-class, auditable
issue-dev-loopfor continuously turning eligible Echo UI issues into verified pull requests while preservingcodeacme17as the only reviewer/merger.What is included
loops/issue-dev-loop/contract, compact state, append-only logs, exactscreen-shots/evidence layout, combo trigger, and evolve policy$implementhandoff and attestation gates for every product-code changeRESUME <run-id>responsesSafety and activation
This PR is intentionally a draft and targets
dev. It must be reviewed and merged by@codeacme17.Before unattended activation, configure distinct executor and reviewer GitHub bot/App identities in
loops/_shared/owner-channel/channel.json. Both values are intentionally leftnull; neither identity may becodeacme17or have merge authority. The durable journal is already configured to issue #105.Verification
pnpm verifyIndependent review history
The loop runtime was independently reviewed in fresh contexts before and after draft publication. Review findings were resolved with mandatory durable checkpoints, canonical remote-state proof, restored checkpoint attestations, identity separation, complete
$implementattestations, exact-head evidence, review-comment completeness, digest-bound screenshots and commands, visible PR proof, branch-bound resume validation, and remote owner-merge rechecks. The final Standards + Spec closure review passed with zero actionable findings against exact heade584cafa46d1e7b365f5f77a0c639fd72bca949c.