Skip to content

Add deltalake feature #2025

Description

@matthewmturner

Is your feature request related to a problem or challenge? Please describe what you are trying to do.
A clear and concise description of what the problem is. Ex. I'm always frustrated when [...]
(This section helps Arrow developers understand the context and why for this feature, in addition to the what)

I would like to be able to register a delta lake deltatable as a table from SQL as part of working on datafusion-tui. For example:

CREATE EXTERNAL TABLE dt
STORED AS DELTATABLE
LOCATION 's3://bucket/schema/table'

From what ive seen this would require adding a FileType and FileFormat for deltatable under deltalake feature, similar to how there is avro feature.

While I understand a delta table isnt exactly a file type / format - i think for the purposes of what were doing with those it meets the definition. Ive played with querying delta tables before and they use register_table as opposed to register_listing_table. So i think we would just need to match based on FileType and then for delta table use register_table instead.

Describe the solution you'd like
A clear and concise description of what you want to happen.
Enable deltatable FileFormat and FileType as features under deltalake

Describe alternatives you've considered
A clear and concise description of any alternative solutions or features you've considered.

Additional context
Add any other context or screenshots about the feature request here.

Activity

  1. matthewmturner commented on Mar 16, 2022

    @matthewmturner
    ContributorAuthor

    @houqp i imagine youll have a view on this.

  2. houqp commented on Mar 20, 2022

    @houqp
    Member

    I think you should be able to add deltalake support to datafusion-tui by leveraging the existing table provider directly without touching datafusion core, see: https://github.com/delta-io/delta-rs/blob/main/rust/src/delta_datafusion.rs.

    There is no need for adding new filetype or file format because deltalake only uses parquet, which we already support in datafusion.

  3. matthewmturner commented on Mar 20, 2022

    @matthewmturner
    ContributorAuthor

    Interesting, ok. I thought there was some more magic going on under the hood (but I hadn't really had chance to look into it) but maybe that only comes into play with some of delta lakes more advanced features like time travel which I don't think is doable without sql extensions.

    I'll try it out and get back to you. Thanks!

  4. avantgardnerio commented on Aug 27, 2022

    @avantgardnerio
    Contributor

    I think @matthewmturner is on to something. The SQL in this issue is straightforward and makes sense from an intuitive user perspective. Why it doesn't work seems like a limitation of DataFusion:

    1. Additional TableProviders can be registered in Rust applications (i.e. datafusion-tui or ballista)
    2. Files can be registered in SQL dynamically at run time - but for built-in TableProviders only
    3. However, there is no dynamic (SQL) way to register a new table with a custom table provider

    Our use-case is running a Ballista server, with delta-rs compiled in, with the intention of allowing users to register tables in locations we can't know at compile time. Unfortunately, I think the way FileFormats work currently doesn't make this possible?

  5. Swoorup commented on Oct 12, 2024

    @Swoorup

    What's currently remaining for this feature?

  6. matthewmturner commented on Oct 12, 2024

    @matthewmturner
    ContributorAuthor

    i dont think deltalake will be added as a "feature" to core datafusion (i.e. this repo) - however, deltalake provides a TableFactoryProvider that makes it very easy to register delta tables to a datafusion SessionContext. it's added as a feature in dft if youre interested in playing with it or want to see how to add it to your own application.

    i am going to close this issue

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Metadata

Metadata

Assignees

No one assigned

    Labels

    enhancementNew feature or request

    Type

    No type

    Projects

    No projects

      Milestone

      No milestone

      Relationships

      None yet

      Development

      No branches or pull requests

      Issue actions