Repository navigation

Consider renaming `AggregateUDFImpl::is_ordered_set_aggregate` to `AggregateUDFImpl::supports_within_group_clause` #18280

Closed

Assignees

Labels

opened

on Oct 25, 2025

Is your feature request related to a problem or challenge?

See #17805 (comment)

Describe the solution you'd like

No response

Describe alternatives you've considered

No response

Additional context

Could make hypothetical-set aggregate functions easier in future: https://www.postgresql.org/docs/9.4/functions-aggregate.html#FUNCTIONS-HYPOTHETICAL-TABLE

Jefffrey
added
enhancementNew feature or request
on Oct 25, 2025
Jefffrey
added the
Feature
issue type on Oct 25, 2025
Jefffrey
self-assigned this
on Oct 31, 2025
github-merge-queue
added a commit that references this issue on Nov 1, 2025
Rename `is_ordered_set_aggregate` to `supports_within_group_clause` f…
5fa1e7e
alamb
closed this as completedin #18397 on Nov 1, 2025
tschwarzinger
added a commit that references this issue on Nov 2, 2025
Rename `is_ordered_set_aggregate` to `supports_within_group_clause` f…
93218fd
codetyri0n
added a commit that references this issue on Nov 11, 2025
Rename `is_ordered_set_aggregate` to `supports_within_group_clause` f…
eee230a

to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Metadata

Assignees

Jefffrey

Labels

Type

Projects

No projects

Milestone

No milestone

Relationships

None yet

Development

No branches or pull requests