Skip to content

Add documentation on supported functions to datafusion website #1487

Closed

Description

@matthewmturner

Is your feature request related to a problem or challenge? Please describe what you are trying to do.
It would be nice to publish to the datafusion website the supported functions. I currently use AWS athena / presto and frequently reference their documentation (https://prestodb.io/docs/current/functions.html) on supported functions. I am looking for datafusion to have something similar.

Describe the solution you'd like
Documentation of supported functions added to datafusion website

Describe alternatives you've considered
A clear and concise description of any alternative solutions or features you've considered.

Additional context
Add any other context or screenshots about the feature request here.

Activity

  1. liukun4515 commented on Dec 26, 2021

    @liukun4515
    Contributor

    Do you have time to do this?
    @matthewmturner

  2. matthewmturner commented on Dec 26, 2021

    @matthewmturner
    ContributorAuthor

    Do you have time to do this?

    @matthewmturner

    I likely won't have time in the near future. But will work on after closing my other issues if it's still available.

  3. matthewmturner commented on Dec 27, 2021

    @matthewmturner
    ContributorAuthor

    I found https://arrow.apache.org/datafusion/python/generated/datafusion.functions.html#module-datafusion.functions on the current website.

    Assuming its expected that the available functions will be the same in rust and python then i think we could pull this out of the functions section and add a Functions section under User Guide. that being said, i havent looked at the code for website yet and not sure if this links directly to python codebase or if we can move it.

    finally, im used to using sql with datafusion but i think would need to be checked that functions are also available for use with dataframe.

  4. andygrove commented on Aug 11, 2022

    @andygrove
    Member

    I think this issue can be closed as a duplicate of #3065 and #3066 (which have been largely addressed now) but feel free to re-open if I am missing anything.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Metadata

Metadata

Assignees

No one assigned

    Labels

    Type

    No type

    Projects

    No projects

      Milestone

      No milestone

      Relationships

      None yet

      Development

      No branches or pull requests

      Issue actions