Skip to content

Avoid stack overflow in Datafusion #1444

Description

@xudong963

Rewrite recursive procedures into iterative procedures, suggested by @houqp @alamb

This is an acceptable short term workaround, but I think it would be more efficient and more elegant if we rewrite these recursive procedures into iterative procedures.

Do you mean to use push-based model?

@xudong963 , I think what @houqp is suggesting is to rewrite code that is recursive to not be recursive.

The pattern for Datafusion probably looks like taking code like

fn visit(expr: &expr)  {
  for child in expr.children() {
    visit(child)
  }
  // do actual expr logic
}

And changing it so the state is tracked with a structure on the heap rather than a stack. I think VecDeque is a good one for rust:

fn visit(expr: &expr)  {
  let mut worklist = VecDequeue::new();
  worklist.push_back(expr);
  while !worklist.is_empty() {
    let parent = worklist.pop_front();
    for child in parent.children() {
      worklist.push_back(child)
    }
    // do actual expr logic on parent
  }
}

(aka avoid the call back to visit)

Originally posted by @alamb in #1437 (comment)

Activity

  1. alamb commented on Dec 14, 2021

    @alamb
    Contributor

    👍

  2. Dandandan commented on Nov 1, 2022

    @Dandandan
    Contributor

    For normal (depth first / FIFO) recursion like the example on top a plain Vec could be used to push and pop the recursive values.

  3. added a commit that references this issue on Mar 23, 2025
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Metadata

Metadata

Assignees

No one assigned

    Labels

    No labels
    No labels

    Type

    No type

    Projects

    No projects

      Milestone

      No milestone

      Relationships

      None yet

      Development

      No branches or pull requests

      Issue actions