Skip to content

Update the user_doc() macro to support multiple alternative syntaxes #13944

Description

@alamb

Originally posted by @Chen-Yuan-Lai in #13924 (comment)

The idea is to migrate the trim function to use the doc macros

However, when @Chen-Yuan-Lai tried to do so in #13924 we found that the second alternative_syntax was ignored

Here is the rust change:

#[user_doc(
    doc_section(label = "String Functions"),
    description = "Trims the specified trim string from the start and end of a string. If no trim string is provided, all whitespace is removed from the start and end of the input string.",
    syntax_example = "btrim(str[, trim_str])",
    alternative_syntax = "trim(BOTH trim_str FROM str)",
    alternative_syntax = "trim(trim_str FROM str)",
    sql_example = r#"```sql
> select btrim('__datafusion____', '_');
+-------------------------------------------+
| btrim(Utf8("__datafusion____"),Utf8("_")) |
+-------------------------------------------+
| datafusion                                |
+-------------------------------------------+
```"#,
    standard_argument(name = "str", prefix = "String"),
    argument(
        name = "trim_str",
        description = "String expression to operate on. Can be a constant, column, or function, and any combination of operators. _Default is whitespace characters._"
    ),
    related_udf(name = "ltrim"),
    related_udf(name = "rtrim")
)]
#[derive(Debug)]
pub struct BTrimFunc {
    signature: Signature,

Then regenerate the documentation:

./dev/update_function_docs.sh

And you'll see that the second syntax is gone

#### Alternative Syntax

-```sql
-trim(BOTH trim_str FROM str)
-```

```sql
trim(trim_str FROM str)

Activity

  1. changed the title [-]@comphead I found that `use_doc()` only supports one alternative syntax. Should we modify it to support multiple alternative syntaxes?[/-] [+]Update the `user_doc()` macro to support multiple alternative syntaxes[/+] on Dec 30, 2024
  2. velaskuez commented on Dec 31, 2024

    @velaskuez
    Contributor

    take

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Metadata

Metadata

Assignees

Labels

No labels
No labels

Type

No type

Projects

No projects

    Milestone

    No milestone

    Relationships

    None yet

    Development

    No branches or pull requests

    Issue actions