Skip to content

[Epic] Improved TreeNode APIs #10121

Closed
Closed

Description

@alamb

Is your feature request related to a problem or challenge?

This is a follow on to #8913 that tracks additional improvements to the TreeNode API

Describe the solution you'd like

Activity

  1. backkem commented on May 8, 2024

    @backkem
    Contributor

    The ConcreteTreeNode seems like quite a nice abstraction. Maybe it's interesting to add for the LogicalPlan & Expr as well.

  2. alamb commented on May 8, 2024

    @alamb
    ContributorAuthor

    The ConcreteTreeNode seems like quite a nice abstraction. Maybe it's interesting to add for the LogicalPlan & Expr as well.

    Sounds like a nice idea to me -- I suspect the best way to do so would be to find a usecase that needed / could benefit from the use of that API and refactor the existing code into the (new) API

  3. alamb commented on Aug 12, 2025

    @alamb
    ContributorAuthor

    I don't know of anything else remaining for this epic so closing down

  4. added
    EPICA larger project, actively underway, with sub tasks
    on Aug 12, 2025
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Metadata

Metadata

Assignees

No one assigned

    Labels

    EPICA larger project, actively underway, with sub tasksenhancementNew feature or request

    Type

    No type

    Projects

    No projects

      Milestone

      No milestone

      Relationships

      None yet

      Development

      No branches or pull requests

      Issue actions