Skip to content

Bug: OpenAI Responses API rejects assistant messages containing internal reasoning / step-* parts #28839

Closed

Description

@ZanzyTHEbar

Description

When using models that route through the OpenAI Responses API (e.g. gpt-5.5 with provider openai), opencode fails with:

ProviderShared.request: OpenAI Responses assistant messages only support text and tool-call content for now

This happens because internal opencode scaffolding parts (reasoning, step-start, step-finish) present in assistant role messages are not being stripped before the request is sent to the Responses endpoint.

Reproduction

Use a model that triggers the Responses path (e.g. openai/gpt-5.5)
Run a long agentic session with many tool calls and internal reasoning steps (common in tech-lead or complex multi-step tasks)

After some time, attempting to continue the session triggers the above error on the next assistant turn.

The session works fine with models that use the traditional Chat Completions path.

Related

Similar message normalization work was done for Anthropic reasoning blocks in PR #23755 (src/provider/transform.ts).

Existing user demand for a Chat Completions fallback: #7793.

Expected behavior

Internal opencode parts (reasoning, step-start, step-finish, etc.) should be filtered out for any provider/API path that only accepts text + tool-call content in assistant messages, with fallback to Chat Completions API if Responses throws an error.

Plugins

dynamic-context-pruning and opencode-rules

OpenCode version

1.15.7

Steps to reproduce

Use a model that triggers the Responses path (e.g. openai/gpt-5.5)
Run a long agentic session with many tool calls and internal reasoning steps (common in tech-lead or complex multi-step tasks)

After some time, attempting to continue the session triggers the above error on the next assistant turn.

The session works fine with models that use the traditional Chat Completions path.

Screenshot and/or share link

No response

Operating System

Linux amd64

Terminal

kitty

Activity

  1. github-actions commented on May 22, 2026

    @github-actions
    Contributor

    This issue might be a duplicate of existing issues. Please check:

    If your issue is distinct or the previous one did not result in a fix, please mention that so we can track it separately.

  2. ZanzyTHEbar commented on May 22, 2026

    @ZanzyTHEbar
    Author

    Closed as duplicate.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Metadata

Metadata

Assignees

Labels

No labels
No labels

Type

No type

Projects

No projects

    Milestone

    No milestone

    Relationships

    None yet

    Development

    No branches or pull requests

    Issue actions