The thinking process of MiniMax-M2.7 cannot be properly displayed in opencode. #22684

Activity

1. majestichou

   added

   bugSomething isn't workingSomething isn't working

   on Apr 16, 2026
2. github-actions

   assigned

   thdxr

   on Apr 16, 2026
3. github-actions

   added

   coreAnything pertaining to core functionality of the application (opencode server stuff)Anything pertaining to core functionality of the application (opencode server stuff)

   on Apr 16, 2026
4. github-actions commented on Apr 16, 2026

   

   github-actionsBot

   on Apr 16, 2026 – with GitHub Actions

   Contributor

   More actions

   This issue might be a duplicate of existing issues. Please check:

   • The thinking process of MiniMax-M2.5 cannot be properly displayed in opencode. #20782: The thinking process of MiniMax-M2.5 cannot be properly displayed in opencode (nearly identical issue with the previous MiniMax model version)
   • MiniMax M2.5 (NVIDIA NIM): Reasoning content shown as ``` tags instead of "Thinking:" format #15543: MiniMax M2.5 (NVIDIA NIM): Reasoning content shown as <think> tags instead of "Thinking:" format (same rendering problem with MiniMax)
   • Support parsing <think> and <thinking> tags as reasoning blocks #11439: Support parsing <think> and <thinking> tags as reasoning blocks (the underlying root cause)

   Please review these issues to see if your report is already covered.

   👍React with 👍1Reacted by Phalla
5. ttimasdf commented on Apr 16, 2026

   

   ttimasdf

   on Apr 16, 2026

   More actions

   The thinking parsing feature was intentionally broken by a PR from an anomalyco team member #11270 . We don't know why.

   👍React with 👍1Reacted by Plastdroid
6. josark2005 commented on Apr 16, 2026

   

   josark2005

   on Apr 16, 2026

   More actions

   same problem
7. FatheredPuma81 commented on Apr 16, 2026

   

   FatheredPuma81

   on Apr 16, 2026

   More actions

   The reason I did this is because you need to send those think tags back to the llm in the assistant message, so yeah we should prolly render them as reasoning but they actually are part of assistant message and need to be sent as such

   It's a visual bug guys.
8. supernovae commented on Apr 25, 2026

   

   supernovae

   on Apr 25, 2026

   More actions

   Visual bug, but annoying.

   👍React with 👍1Reacted by Konstantinos Kalyfommatos
9. thdxr

   assigned

   rekram1-node

   and unassigned

   thdxr

   on Apr 26, 2026
10. thdxr

    removed

    bugSomething isn't workingSomething isn't working

    coreAnything pertaining to core functionality of the application (opencode server stuff)Anything pertaining to core functionality of the application (opencode server stuff)

    on May 3, 2026
11. thdxr

    assigned

    nexxeln

    and unassigned

    rekram1-node

    on May 3, 2026
12. github-actions commented on Jul 3, 2026

    

    github-actionsBot

    on Jul 3, 2026 – with GitHub Actions

    Contributor

    More actions

    To stay organized issues are automatically closed after 60 days of no activity. If the issue is still relevant please open a new one.
13. github-actions

    closed this as not plannedon Jul 3, 2026