feat: add LiteLLM provider support #22212

Activity

1. github-actions

   assigned

   rekram1-node

   on Apr 12, 2026
2. github-actions

   added

   coreAnything pertaining to core functionality of the application (opencode server stuff)Anything pertaining to core functionality of the application (opencode server stuff)

   on Apr 12, 2026
3. github-actions commented on Apr 12, 2026

   

   github-actionsBot

   on Apr 12, 2026 – with GitHub Actions

   Contributor

   More actions

   This issue doesn't fully meet our contributing guidelines.

   What needs to be fixed:

   • Feature request titles must start with [FEATURE]: (current title: feat: add LiteLLM provider support)

   Please edit this issue to address the above within 2 hours, or it will be automatically closed.

   ---

   This issue might be a duplicate of existing issues. Please check:

   • [FEATURE]: Auto-load available models from LiteLLM proxy with autoload option #13891: Feature request to add LiteLLM proxy support with auto-loading models via litellmProxy and autoload options — covers very similar ground (built-in LiteLLM provider integration)

   If you believe this was flagged incorrectly, please let a maintainer know.
4. github-actions

   added

   needs:complianceThis means the issue will auto-close after 2 hours.This means the issue will auto-close after 2 hours.

   on Apr 12, 2026
5. github-actions commented on Apr 13, 2026

   

   github-actionsBot

   on Apr 13, 2026 – with GitHub Actions

   Contributor

   More actions

   This issue has been automatically closed because it was not updated to meet our contributing guidelines within the 2-hour window.

   Feel free to open a new issue that follows our issue templates.
6. github-actions

   removed

   needs:complianceThis means the issue will auto-close after 2 hours.This means the issue will auto-close after 2 hours.

   on Apr 13, 2026
7. github-actions

   closed this as not plannedon Apr 13, 2026
8. Lukas-Ertl commented on Jun 24, 2026

   

   Lukas-Ertl

   on Jun 24, 2026

   More actions

   +1

   👍React with 👍1Reacted by Jason Allen
9. jsilvermist commented on Sep 13, 2026

   

   jsilvermist

   on Sep 13, 2026

   More actions

   I see this was closed as not planned by github-actions? Can this be revisited, as it's currently a massive undertaking to manually sync all models and their related metadata/capabilities.