Repository navigation
perf: [AutoDeploy] Enable AutoDeploy as a backend in trtllm-bench - #3041
Conversation
|
@kaiyux to make sure he is aware of the addition of AutoDeploy as another backend of trtllm-bench. Thanks |
Signed-off-by: Suyog Gupta <suyogg@nvidia.com>
Signed-off-by: Suyog Gupta <suyogg@nvidia.com>
Signed-off-by: Suyog Gupta <suyogg@nvidia.com>
Signed-off-by: Suyog Gupta <suyogg@nvidia.com>
8fb54ab to
d58d8d6
Compare
|
/bot run |
|
PR_Github #355 [ run ] triggered by Bot |
|
PR_Github #355 [ run ] completed with state |
|
/bot run |
|
PR_Github #376 [ run ] triggered by Bot |
|
PR_Github #376 [ run ] completed with state |
|
The @suyoggupta Is it possible to split the PR so that it only includes the changes of "enables the integration of TRTLLM-bench with AutoDeploy"? I see there are also a bunch of changes under AutoDeploy core |
@kaiyux : The changes in autodeploy are needed to ensure the throughput benchmark in tensorrt-llm-bench can run without OOM. Those changes ensure that the autodeploy executor allocates a large enough kv-cache as required by the throughput test. So unfortunately, these changes have be bundled together. |
Signed-off-by: Suyog Gupta <suyogg@nvidia.com>
|
/bot run |
|
PR_Github #455 [ run ] triggered by Bot |
|
PR_Github #455 [ run ] completed with state |
lucaslie
left a comment
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Looks great. Just a few minor improvements
|
PR_Github #475 [ run ] completed with state |
Signed-off-by: Suyog Gupta <suyogg@nvidia.com>
|
/bot run |
|
PR_Github #496 [ run ] triggered by Bot |
|
PR_Github #496 [ run ] completed with state |
|
/bot run |
|
PR_Github #514 [ run ] triggered by Bot |
If that's the case, maybe we should merge those changes in core library firstly? There shouldn't be features "required by" the bench scripts, does that make sense? Though I agree to save some overheads by avoid submitting another PR, just wanted to clarify and align the principle here. Thanks. |
kaiyux
left a comment
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Approving on trtllm-bench changes. Thanks.
Signed-off-by: Suyog Gupta <suyogg@nvidia.com>
|
PR_Github #514 [ run ] completed with state |
|
/bot run |
|
PR_Github #548 [ run ] triggered by Bot |
|
PR_Github #548 [ run ] completed with state |
Signed-off-by: Suyog Gupta <suyogg@nvidia.com>
|
/bot run |
|
PR_Github #612 [ run ] triggered by Bot |
I agree with the general principle and something we can follow for subsequent PRs. |
|
PR_Github #612 [ run ] completed with state |
…IDIA#3041) * Enable AutoDeploy as a backend in trtllm-bench Signed-off-by: Suyog Gupta <suyogg@nvidia.com> * update how caches are resized Signed-off-by: Suyog Gupta <suyogg@nvidia.com> * fix: files permission from 100755 to 100644 Signed-off-by: Suyog Gupta <suyogg@nvidia.com> * some comments Signed-off-by: Suyog Gupta <suyogg@nvidia.com> * lint Signed-off-by: Suyog Gupta <suyogg@nvidia.com> * lint Signed-off-by: Suyog Gupta <suyogg@nvidia.com> * lint Signed-off-by: Suyog Gupta <suyogg@nvidia.com> * lint Signed-off-by: Suyog Gupta <suyogg@nvidia.com> * Fix function name Signed-off-by: Suyog Gupta <suyogg@nvidia.com> * refactor Signed-off-by: Suyog Gupta <suyogg@nvidia.com> * Remove spurious change Signed-off-by: Suyog Gupta <suyogg@nvidia.com> * Add cursor generated doc strings Signed-off-by: Suyog Gupta <suyogg@nvidia.com> * re-enable ad test Signed-off-by: Suyog Gupta <suyogg@nvidia.com> * some perf cleanup Signed-off-by: Suyog Gupta <suyogg@nvidia.com> * debug ci Signed-off-by: Suyog Gupta <suyogg@nvidia.com> * ensure that overlap scheduler is enabled Signed-off-by: Suyog Gupta <suyogg@nvidia.com> * Reorder the tests Signed-off-by: Suyog Gupta <suyogg@nvidia.com> --------- Signed-off-by: Suyog Gupta <suyogg@nvidia.com> Co-authored-by: Kaiyu Xie <26294424+kaiyux@users.noreply.github.com>
Next step is to close the perf gap between AutoDeploy and Pytorch backends.
Current results
Max throughput for llama3.1 8B ISL/OSL=128/128, fp16. H100.
AutoDeploy using FlashInfer attn backend:
Pytorch using FlashInfer backend: