Skip to content

[Feature]: Solve the Perf regression test large variance #8391

Closed

Description

@MrGeva

🚀 The feature, motivation and pitch

The test_perf.py regression test shows large variance when run in CI. I see that it runs on two different device types: H100 NVL and H100 PCIE. according to that the perf varies and also the clock frequencies. Need to ability to define threshold per device type if possible, otherwise need to use only one device type by applying a filter in the ci definitions (devops said that they use two device kinds due to machine shortage). see the attached excel chart analyzing the perf variance in correlation to the clock freqs implying difference in perf is due to two different freq levels due to two different device types being used.

test_report_test_perf_metric_token_throughput_llama_v3.1_8b_instruct-bench-_autodeploy-float16-maxbs_512-maxnt_2.csv

Alternatives

No response

Additional context

No response

Before submitting a new issue...

  • Make sure you already searched for relevant issues, and checked the documentation and examples for answers to frequently asked questions.

Activity

  1. added
    feature requestNew feature or request. This includes new model, dtype, functionality support
    on Oct 15, 2025
  2. added
    General perf<NV>Broad performance issues not specific to a particular component
    on Oct 15, 2025
  3. moved this from Backlog to In progress in AutoDeploy Boardon Oct 15, 2025
  4. moved this from In progress to In review in AutoDeploy Boardon Oct 21, 2025
  5. added a commit that references this issue on Oct 22, 2025
  6. added a commit that references this issue on Oct 24, 2025
  7. added 4 commits that reference this issue on Nov 1, 2025
  8. moved this from In review to In progress in AutoDeploy Boardon Nov 13, 2025
  9. added a commit that references this issue on Nov 25, 2025
  10. added a commit that references this issue on Nov 25, 2025
  11. added a commit that references this issue on Dec 11, 2025
  12. added a commit that references this issue on Jan 4, 2026
  13. moved this from In progress to In review in AutoDeploy Boardon Jan 11, 2026
  14. added a commit that references this issue on Jan 11, 2026
  15. added 2 commits that reference this issue on Jan 14, 2026
  16. moved this from In review to Done in AutoDeploy Boardon Jan 18, 2026
  17. closed this as completedby moving to Done in AutoDeploy Boardon Jan 18, 2026
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Metadata

Metadata

Assignees

Labels

AutoDeploy<NV> AutoDeploy BackendGeneral perf<NV>Broad performance issues not specific to a particular componentfeature requestNew feature or request. This includes new model, dtype, functionality support

Type

No type

Projects

    Milestone

    No milestone

    Relationships

    None yet

    Development

    No branches or pull requests

    Issue actions