some nice scala defaults - #673
Conversation
|
As for tests, 99% can be covered with |
|
With Would excute "delete" key but would just write the letters |
|
of course 😄 I'll update later tonight when I get home from work. Helps to keep my mind of the world that is burning around us. |
|
I updated the PR but I don't think that changes the way the |
|
The problem might be with the conditional handlers... I'm not sure we have tests for that yet. I'll try to look at that as well. |
|
I also completely forgot about this. |
|
hmm, I never worked out what was going on here. AFAIK it should be passing ... did you ever find the time to look into what the problem could be? |
|
I'm going to right after your other PR. I feel terrible now having it lying here for so long. I'm on vacation now which is the best time for hacking! Thanks for your patience. |
|
it's ok I think I have these in my personal config so I haven't been missing out 😄 the ability to hack my own emacs sometimes makes me lazy at implementing features properly in my own projects and then I talk to people who ask "can you make it do X?" and I'm like "it already does X, what do you mean? oooooh... that one is in my |
|
I feel the same way about my flycheck hacks :/ Still, I've read a nice blog about optimistic merging recently and I would like to start following that. It engages people a lot better. |
|
Turns out You need to execute the entire thing in one call to (execute-kbd-macro (kbd "{ RET f SPC => SPC f.toString"))which "types" I had to dig a bit into Emacs to get to the bottom of this. Reading code always works :D |
|
Wow, that's really bizarre. We should add this to a comment to save some poor soul from suffering in the future. |
|
Closed in 10657cc. Thanks for the contribution! |
Good point, I will add it to the testing page on the wiki as well. |
|
Thank you again! Need to find myself some time to hack on some Emacs lisp soon. Been missing it. |
this is a WIP because I'm not sure how to write the tests correctly:
execute-kbd-macrois inserting text explicitly, and not triggering the special rulesset-mark?