Skip to content

Move our testing from POP masks to MOM masks (mt233) #2540

Open
1 of 1 issue completed
Open

Description

@ekluzek

In CESM2.0/CESM2.1/CESM2.2 series POP was the default ocean model. In CESM3, POP is going to be removed and MOM will be the ocean model that's used. The masks used in our testing have been POP masks (gx1v7 and gx3v7 for example). But, as part of CESM going to use MOM, we need to update our testing (and list of scientifically supported compsets) to use MOM ocean masks rather than POP. MOM does NOT have a low resolution grid (and they are removing the t061 grid), so we will use t232 for ALL grids (now the updated t233 grid)

Activity

  1. changed the title [-]Move our testing from POP masks to MOM masks[/-] [+]Move our testing from POP masks to MOM masks (mt232)[/+] on May 15, 2024
  2. added
    nextthis should get some attention in the next week or two. Normally each Thursday SE meeting.
    on May 15, 2024
  3. ekluzek commented on May 15, 2024

    @ekluzek
    ContributorAuthor

    In yesterdays CSEG meeting we verified that this is important to do and we will do it CESM wide. So CESM and CAM will have to change their testing and science support as well.

  4. ekluzek commented on Jul 8, 2024

    @ekluzek
    ContributorAuthor

    For the capability freeze we should at least have some tests with MOM masks.

  5. removed
    nextthis should get some attention in the next week or two. Normally each Thursday SE meeting.
    on Jul 8, 2024
  6. added
    scienceEnhancement to or bug impacting science
    and removed on Aug 8, 2024
  7. 19 remaining items

  8. ekluzek commented on May 1, 2026

    @ekluzek
    ContributorAuthor

    This now definitely needs to be mt233. We now have the ability to run with mt233 grids in CTSM and it's now being used in coupled simulations. And the Ocean group is committed to using the new grid at this point.

  9. self-assigned this
    on Sep 16, 2026
  10. moved this from Todo to In Progress in LMWG: Sprint Planning Boardon Sep 22, 2026
  11. slevis-lmwg commented on Sep 22, 2026

    @slevis-lmwg
    Contributor

    From meeting with @ekluzek

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Metadata

Metadata

Assignees

Labels

blocked: dependencyWait to work on this until dependency is resolvedenhancementnew capability or improved behavior of existing capabilitypriority: highHigh priority to fix/merge soon, e.g., because it is a problem in important configurationsscienceEnhancement to or bug impacting scienceusabilityImprove or clarify user-facing options

Projects

Relationships

None yet

Development

No branches or pull requests

Issue actions