Skip to content

Validate CISM -> ocean runoff fluxes for nuopc/cmeps #70

Open

Description

@billsacks

Looking back through my notes, I don't think @mvertens and I ever validated the CISM -> ocean runoff fluxes for nuopc/cmeps. We validated the glc to lnd and lnd to glc fields, ensuring that they look the same with nuopc as with mct, but I don't think we ever verified that the runoff fluxes look the same in nuopc as in mct.

#69 should be done before this (and that issue is what made me think of this one).

@mvertens @whlipscomb @Katetc

Activity

  1. moved this from Needs Prioritization to Todo ~ months in CESM: infrastructure / cross-component SE prioritieson Apr 15, 2022
  2. billsacks commented on Apr 4, 2024

    @billsacks
    MemberAuthor

    @mvertens @whlipscomb @KateC in reviewing some open issues, this one came to my attention as something needed for CESM3.

  3. billsacks commented on Apr 4, 2024

    @billsacks
    MemberAuthor

    Sorry, meant to tag @Katetc there.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Metadata

Metadata

Assignees

No one assigned

    Type

    No type

    Projects

    Milestone

    No milestone

    Relationships

    None yet

    Development

    No branches or pull requests

    Issue actions