[billsacks]

Description of changes

With the changes in ESCOMP/CESM#407 and ESCOMP/CAM#1584, we no longer need to allow for C/E at the end of the time period.

Related to #413; I somehow missed these changes there

Specific notes

Contributors other than yourself, if any: none

CDEPS Issues Fixed (include github issue #): none

Are there dependencies on other component PRs (if so list):

• Change long name specifier for CO2 forcings CESM#407
• cam6_4_187: Change specification for CO2 concentration-driven compsets CAM#1584

Are changes expected to change answers (bfb, different to roundoff, more substantial): bfb

Any User Interface Changes (namelist or namelist defaults changes): none

Testing performed (e.g. aux_cdeps, CESM prealpha, etc):
(1) aux_cdeps
(2) aux_cime_baseline tests that include DOCN:

ERP_Ln9.f09_f09_mg17.F2000climo.derecho_intel.cam-outfrq9s
ERP_Ln9.f09_f09_mg17.FHIST.derecho_intel.cam-outfrq9s
ERP_Ln9.f09_f09_mg17.FHIST_BGC.derecho_intel.cam-outfrq9s
ERP_Ln9.f09_f09_mg17.F1850.derecho_intel.cam-outfrq9s
ERP_D_Ln9.f19_f19_mg17.QPC6.derecho_intel.cam-outfrq9s
ERP_D_Ln9_P64x2.f09_f09_mg17.QSC6.derecho_intel.cam-outfrq9s
ERI.TL319_t232.DTEST.derecho_intel.cice-default
ERS_D_Ld5.TL319_t232.DTEST.derecho_intel.cice-default

All tests pass and are bit-for-bit with baselines.

Hashes used for testing: cesm3_0_beta10

[mvertens]

@billsacks - I suggest removing the grid specific settings since CDEPS does the interpolation and none of these resolutions are actually being used. I have removed them from a PR I am working on to bring in input4mip forcing. We should talk about that to hopefully coordinate the NorESM and ESCOMP cdeps settings.

[billsacks]

I suggest removing the grid specific settings since CDEPS does the interpolation and none of these resolutions are actually being used. I have removed them from a PR I am working on to bring in input4mip forcing. We should talk about that to hopefully coordinate the NorESM and ESCOMP cdeps settings.

My feeling is that that is a separate change outside the scope of this PR: I'd like to keep this one limited and straightforward. I'm happy to talk to you about that removal of grid-specific settings, though I'd like to run that by someone in the CAM group who might have a better sense of that than I do.

[mvertens]

@billsacks - good point about the separate change. This could be a follow on PR.