Skip to content

DATM CPLHIST test needs to be fixed and then restored #408

Description

@billsacks

I prematurely merged #405 without realizing that the DATM CPLHIST test (SMS_Ld5.f10_f10_mt232.1850_DATM%CPLHIST_SLND_SICE_SOCN_SROF_SGLC_SWAV_SESP.derecho_intel.datm-cplhist) is currently failing.

The problem is that a dtlimit is exceeded due to too big of a discrepancy between dtmin and dtmax:

(shr_strdata_readstrm)     reading file ub: /glade/campaign/cesm/cesmdata/inputdata/cplhist/cesm3_0/b.e30_alpha08o.B1850C_MTso.ne30_t232_wgx3.330/atm/b.e30_alpha08o.B1850C_MTso.ne30_t232_wgx3.330.cpl.hx.atm.1h.inst.0101-01-01-03600.nc
(shr_strdata_advance)      Stream: 1 reading new data with  LB ymd,tod = 1010101  2700   UB ymd,tod = 1010101  6300
(shr_strdata_advance)  ERROR: for stream 1
(shr_strdata_advance)  ERROR: calendar = NO_LEAP
(shr_strdata_advance)  ERROR: dday = 0
(shr_strdata_advance)  ERROR: dtime, dtmax, dtmin, dtlimit =  4.166667E-02   3.340417E+02   4.166667E-02   3.000000E+00

I'm going to temporarily remove this test from the test list until this problem can be resolved. @ekluzek whenever you have time to resolve it (no rush!!!), it can be reinstated.

Activity

  1. billsacks commented on May 21, 2026

    @billsacks
    MemberAuthor

    This will mean backing out the changes in #409 .

  2. added 2 commits that reference this issue on May 21, 2026
  3. wwieder commented on May 21, 2026

    @wwieder
    Contributor

    Does this mean we should make a cesm alpha09 tag that uses #409, or should we wait until this issue is resolved before making the alpha tag?

    Second, Is this something that @slevis-lmwg could help with, or is it lower priority and can wait for @ekluzek to return?

  4. billsacks commented on May 21, 2026

    @billsacks
    MemberAuthor

    I could be wrong, but my impression is that the data set pointed to here was just for software testing purposes, so this shouldn't hold anything up... but I haven't been in the loop with the plan for the land model spinup so I could be wrong on that.

  5. moved this from Todo to In Progress in LMWG: Sprint Planning Boardon May 21, 2026
  6. slevis-lmwg commented on May 21, 2026

    @slevis-lmwg
    Contributor

    @wwieder requested that investigate this:

    • In ctsm5.4.040 (our latest master tag) I updated from cdeps1.0.93 to cdeps1.0.94 and ran the test: PASS (expected)
    • I updated from cdeps1.0.94 to cdeps1.0.95 and ran the test: FAIL with the error reported above (expected) AND TestStatus.log also includes a long list of warnings like this one:
       WARNING:not adding missing file /glade/campaign/cesm/cesmdata/inputdata/cplhist/cesm3_0/b.e30_alpha08o.B1850C_MTso.ne30_t232_wgx3.330/atm/b.e30_alpha08o.B1850C_MTso.ne30_t232_wgx3.330.cpl.hx.atm.1h.inst.0101-02-01-03600.nc
       WARNING:not adding missing file /glade/campaign/cesm/cesmdata/inputdata/cplhist/cesm3_0/b.e30_alpha08o.B1850C_MTso.ne30_t232_wgx3.330/atm/b.e30_alpha08o.B1850C_MTso.ne30_t232_wgx3.330.cpl.hx.atm.1h.inst.0101-02-02-03600.nc
    ...
    
    • I reverted the change from Erik's commit 0bdb38e and ran the test: PASS

    @billsacks @ekluzek @wwieder I interpret this to mean that Erik's commit that looks for Cecile's cplhist data in /inputdata fails to find it there. I see two options, and will wait for feedback:

    • Revert Erik's commit and point to Cecile's /scratch directory again until the data gets copied
    • OR I could look into copying the data if you wish
  7. wwieder commented on May 21, 2026

    @wwieder
    Contributor

    Thanks for looking into this, @slevis-lmwg.

    It seems like a simple enough issue to address, but I'll let more SE-minded collaborators decide how to maintain this long-term.
    Let's shelve this until @ekluzek and @billsacks are back from leave to address this.

  8. slevis-lmwg commented on May 21, 2026

    @slevis-lmwg
    Contributor

    Browsing the list of missing files suggests that the model does not find 12 months of data (present in Cecile's /scratch) and finds only 1 month in /inputdata. For the full list of missing files, see /glade/derecho/scratch/slevis/SMS_Ld5.f10_f10_mt232.1850_DATM%CPLHIST_SLND_SICE_SOCN_SROF_SGLC_SWAV_SESP.derecho_intel.datm-cplhist.20260521_154000_oiao8p/TestStatus.log

  9. slevis-lmwg commented on May 22, 2026

    @slevis-lmwg
    Contributor

    I will mark "done" in my Sprint accounting. Can always change later.

  10. 7 remaining items

  11. self-assigned this
    on Jun 25, 2026
  12. added
    enhancementNew feature or request
    Responsibility: CTSMResponsibility to manage and accomplish this issue is the CTSM Software group
    on Jun 25, 2026
  13. added theissue type on Jun 25, 2026
  14. moved this from Todo to No status in LMWG: Sprint Planning Boardon Jun 25, 2026
  15. moved this from Todo to No status in LMWG: Sprint Planning Boardon Jun 25, 2026
  16. moved this from Todo to No status in LMWG: Sprint Planning Boardon Jun 25, 2026
  17. added a commit that references this issue on Jul 2, 2026
    40d2785
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Metadata

Metadata

Assignees

Labels

CESM OnlyResponsibility: CTSMResponsibility to manage and accomplish this issue is the CTSM Software groupenhancementNew feature or request

Projects

Milestone

No milestone

Relationships

None yet

Development

No branches or pull requests

Issue actions