Skip to content

Question (redis-ha): is valkey support planned for the future? #297

Open

Description

@Sven1410

Hi,
since redis changed their licence type we are thinking about a move to the valkey fork. The argocd community is also discussing it, see: argoproj/argo-cd#17970
Currently the valkey image seems to be 100% compatible - the redis-ha chart still works good after replacing the redis image with valkey (tested with 8.0.1). But this can change in the future.
So we see the option to move to a different chart - I found only 2 options so far:
(bitnami - not our preferred option) https://github.com/bitnami/charts/tree/main/bitnami/valkey
(groundhog2k - small and new, but unclear adoption) https://github.com/groundhog2k/helm-charts/tree/master/charts/valkey

So my question is now: Do you think you will support the valkey images in the future? (especially if they will be incompatible)
Or is this totally out of your scope and you will focus on redis only.

Thanks in advance for clarification,
Sven

Activity

  1. DandyDeveloper commented on Oct 24, 2024

    @DandyDeveloper
    Owner

    I don't personally have objection to a native OSS alternative to prevent licensing issues for consumers of the chart.

    I haven't tested this with the chart out of the box.

    I think with ArgoCD being the biggest downstream consumer of this that (that I'm aware of), I would happily follow their lead as a community.

    The biggest test that needs doing is HA and adjustments to facilitate in something like Valkey.

  2. maxisam commented on Apr 1, 2025

    @maxisam

    https://github.com/hyperspike/valkey-operator

    i think someone is working on operator. It is a different solution tho.

  3. pierluigilenoci commented on Sep 15, 2025

    @pierluigilenoci
    Contributor

    This is a really interesting feature.

  4. DandyDeveloper commented on Sep 15, 2025

    @DandyDeveloper
    Owner

    @pierluigilenoci I've come back to this again as well, I think this would be better as its own chart.

    Eventually, Valkey / Redis will branch off in different directions on how to interact with their clients and supporting 2 different charts would be simpler in the long term.

    Example being Elasticsearch / Opensearch and how they drifted completely apart and Opensearch ended up breaking the larger managed community chart because of that drift.

  5. mveroone commented on Sep 18, 2025

    @mveroone

    Hey.
    The second biggest downstream user of your chart is oauth2-Proxy, (or so I think), after ArgoCD.
    But in both cases, doesn't using Redis as part of their product or distribution medium go against both of these project's OSS License ?

  6. erolclk1 commented on Jan 22, 2026

    @erolclk1

    Hi @DandyDeveloper is the chart for valkey still under develop ?

  7. DandyDeveloper commented on Jan 23, 2026

    @DandyDeveloper
    Owner

    @erolclk1 Right now, it's purely a time issue for me. I don't have time to spend on this lately with real work and personal life.

    I'm more than happy for someone to extract what they can and make a Valkey chart, I may have a branch somewhere that started this. I just never got time to do it.

  8. Sven1410 commented on Jan 23, 2026

    @Sven1410
    Author

    just as an info: we are currently using the valkey 9.0 image with redis-ha chart version: 4.34.11 - works fine. So far the valkey image seems to be 100% compatible.

  9. bootc commented on Feb 10, 2026

    @bootc
    Contributor

    I've been using the chart with Valkey for ages, more or less since the fork happened. The only thing I've found I need to change is to put this in the values file:

    sentinel:
      customCommand: [valkey-server]
      customArgs: [/data/conf/sentinel.conf, --sentinel]

    I added those settings in 2024 with #277.

  10. flamein commented on Feb 13, 2026

    @flamein

    Valkey also now has it's own helmchart: https://github.com/valkey-io/valkey-helm

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Metadata

Metadata

Assignees

No one assigned

    Labels

    enhancementNew feature or request

    Projects

    No projects

      Milestone

      No milestone

      Relationships

      None yet

      Development

      No branches or pull requests

      Issue actions