Skip to content

๐Ÿ›ก๏ธ Sentinel: [MEDIUM] ๋‚ด๋ถ€๋ง SSRF ์šฐํšŒ ์ทจ์•ฝ์  ์ˆ˜์ • - #1890

Open
seonghobae wants to merge 1 commit into
developfrom
fix/url-validation-internal-bypass-11409230068183996832
Open

seonghobae wants to merge 1 commit into
developfrom
fix/url-validation-internal-bypass-11409230068183996832

Conversation

@seonghobae

@seonghobae seonghobae commented Oct 9, 2026 •

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

๐Ÿšจ Severity: MEDIUM
๐Ÿ’ก Vulnerability: SSRF ํ•„ํ„ฐ๋ง ๋กœ์ง ์ค‘ ํ˜ธ์ŠคํŠธ๋„ค์ž„์ด ์ •ํ™•ํžˆ "internal"์ผ ๊ฒฝ์šฐ๋ฅผ ์ฐจ๋‹จํ•˜์ง€ ๋ชปํ•˜๋Š” ์ทจ์•ฝ์ ์ด ์žˆ์—ˆ์Šต๋‹ˆ๋‹ค.
๐ŸŽฏ Impact: ๊ณต๊ฒฉ์ž๊ฐ€ https://internal/... ํ˜•์‹์˜ Webhook URL์„ ๋“ฑ๋กํ•ด ๋‚ด๋ถ€๋ง ์ž์›์— ์ ‘๊ทผํ•  ์ˆ˜ ์žˆ์Šต๋‹ˆ๋‹ค.
๐Ÿ”ง Fix: backend/api/tools.py์˜ validate_webhook_url_details ํ•จ์ˆ˜์—์„œ ํ˜ธ์ŠคํŠธ๋„ค์ž„ ๊ฒ€์ฆ ์‹œ ์ •ํ™•ํžˆ "internal"์ธ ๊ฒฝ์šฐ๋„ ์ฐจ๋‹จํ•˜๋„๋ก hostname == "internal" ์กฐ๊ฑด์„ ์ถ”๊ฐ€ํ–ˆ์Šต๋‹ˆ๋‹ค.
โœ… Verification: ๊ด€๋ จ test_tools_api.py ํ…Œ์ŠคํŠธ ์ฝ”๋“œ์—๋„ https://internal์„ ์ฐจ๋‹จํ•˜๋Š”์ง€ ๊ฒ€์ฆํ•˜๋Š” ํ…Œ์ŠคํŠธ๋ฅผ ์ถ”๊ฐ€ํ•˜์˜€์œผ๋ฉฐ, pytest ์ „์ฒด ํ†ต๊ณผ๋ฅผ ํ™•์ธํ–ˆ์Šต๋‹ˆ๋‹ค.


PR created automatically by Jules for task 11409230068183996832 started by @seonghobae

Summary by CodeRabbit

  • Bug Fixes
    • Webhook URL validation now rejects the exact hostname internal, in addition to .internal and .local hostnames.

@google-labs-jules

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

๐Ÿ‘‹ Jules, reporting for duty! I'm here to lend a hand with this pull request.

When you start a review, I'll add a ๐Ÿ‘€ emoji to each comment to let you know I've read it. I'll focus on feedback directed at me and will do my best to stay out of conversations between you and other bots or reviewers to keep the noise down.

I'll push a commit with your requested changes shortly after. Please note there might be a delay between these steps, but rest assured I'm on the job!

For more direct control, you can switch me to Reactive Mode. When this mode is on, I will only act on comments where you specifically mention me with @jules. You can find this option in the Pull Request section of your global Jules UI settings. You can always switch back!

New to Jules? Learn more at jules.google/docs.


For security, I will only act on instructions from the user who triggered this task.

@coderabbitai

coderabbitai Bot commented Oct 9, 2026 •

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Review in Change Stack โ†’

No actionable comments were generated in the recent review. ๐ŸŽ‰

โ„น๏ธ Recent review info
โš™๏ธ Run configuration
  • Configuration used: Repository: ContextualWisdomLab/naruon/.coderabbit.yaml
  • Review profile: CHILL
  • Plan: Advanced
  • Run ID: ace31f9e-6c49-4bd0-9808-f3a83fd6982d

๐Ÿ“ฅ Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between 042b0c7 and 068c574.


๐Ÿ“’ Files selected for processing (3)
  • .jules/sentinel.md
  • backend/api/tools.py
  • backend/tests/test_tools_api.py

Included review availability: This review used your included allowance. Your plan provides up to 1 included review per hour; 0 remain after this review.



๐Ÿ“ Walkthrough

Walkthrough

Webhook hostname validation now rejects the exact hostname internal, in addition to .internal and .local suffixes. The tests cover https://internal, and a sentinel entry documents the exact-hostname case.

Changes

Webhook hostname validation

Layer / File(s) Summary
Exact hostname check and coverage
backend/api/tools.py, backend/tests/test_tools_api.py, .jules/sentinel.md
The validator rejects the exact hostname internal. A test covers https://internal, and the sentinel entry documents the case. The test parameterization and surrounding whitespace were also reformatted.

Priority: โฌ†๏ธ High

Estimated code review effort: 2 (Simple) | ~8 minutes

Change: Bug fix


Merge Risk: โšช Minimal ยท up to 068c5

The reported webhook hostname gap is addressed, and no actionable merge-blocking risk remains after normal checks.

Pre-merge checks | Passed 4
โœ… Passed checks (4 passed)
Check name Status Explanation
Description Check Passed Check skipped - CodeRabbitโ€™s high-level summary is enabled.
Title check Passed The title accurately identifies the internal-network SSRF bypass fix, which is the main change in the pull request.
Linked Issues check Passed Check skipped because no linked issues were found for this pull request.
Out of Scope Changes check Passed Check skipped because no linked issues were found for this pull request.


โœจ Finishing Touches
๐Ÿ“ Generate docstrings
  • Commit to this branch
  • Create a new PR

๐Ÿงช Generate unit tests (beta)
  • Commit to this branch
  • Create a new PR


  • Autofix ยท Keep fixing CodeRabbit findings and required CI, and resolving merge conflicts

Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out.

โค๏ธ Share

Comment @coderabbitai help to get the list of available commands.

This branch has not been deployed

No deployments
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant