You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
{{ message }}
Repository navigation
Proposal: position paper — Identifier Durability: Machine-Readable Canonical IRIs (public comment on draft 0.4.0) #56
Per the README's guidance to open an issue before submitting a significant revision: a PR is incoming that adds a position paper to research/ — "Identifier Durability: Machine-Readable Canonical IRIs" — filed as a public comment during draft-cdcf-catholic-uri-scheme-03 (v0.4.0)'s 60-day comment window.
The one-line thesis: "and," not "or" — machine-readable canonical identifiers that never drift, and a guaranteed human-readable layer (every existing slug preserved forever as a resolvable alias; multilingual labels; a rendering rule so production surfaces always show a label beside the ID). It is written as a small delta to draft 0.4.0: it keeps the two-artifact model, notations, and the stability guarantee, and inverts only which artifact is primary.
Companion suggested-change PRs land in the six data registries (crmedr, cledr, cecdr, ciclsaldr, clbdr, cmddr), each demonstrating recorded cases from that repo's own history.
Activity