|
I have tried comparing multiple legacy projects, and without exception, the 3.0.0 version always consumes more Flash space than the 2.X.X versions. Win11 25H2 For example, in this project, the Flash footprint after compilation is completely different. STM32 CORE 2.6.0 STM32 CORE 2.11.0 STM32 CORE 2.12.0 STM32 CORE 3.0.0 |
Replies: 1 comment
|
Hi @sunnyguhz Deployment of the ArduinoCore-API is the main responsible of this.
|
Hi @sunnyguhz
Deployment of the ArduinoCore-API is the main responsible of this.
Here the analysis made using GH Copilot: